I agree, some people actually want to use the title to make a difference in the city than live in - rather than get beat out by a traveling pageant queen with years of experience competing and getting to know the judges. In my opinion, a pageant featuring a former MCOT is not worth competing in unless there are additional titles (which is probably why they reintroduced Miss Golden Gate when Crystal competed and Miss County of SF when Jordan did). -- Miss California Unofficial Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: I agree, some people actually want to use the title to make a difference in the city than live in - rather than get beat out by a traveling pageant queen with years of experience competing and getting to know the judges. In my opinion, a pageant featuring a former MCOT is not worth competing in unless there are additional titles (which is probably why they reintroduced Miss Golden Gate when Crystal competed and Miss County of SF when Jordan did).

Author:
Some things are transparent
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01:42:54 03/12/14 Wed
In reply to: Lauren 's message, "Re: In my estimation cities the size of San Francisco should have enough competitors from a city of over 600,000. No need to make that city an open pageant. Now I can see Hollywood being an open pageant. Not many people live in Hollywood." on 22:33:15 03/11/14 Tue

....

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Lauren the population of San Francisco is actually over 700K. The population of LA is over 3 million. So my question to you is why do you hold a different standard for San Fran then you do LA?

Author:
#60daysoflove
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 15:28:36 03/12/14 Wed

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Lauren the population of San Francisco is actually over 700K. The population of LA is over 3 million. So my question to you is why do you hold a different standard for San Fran then you do LA?
Author: #60daysoflove [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 15:28:36 03/12/14 Wed [ Post a Reply to This Message ]