VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, June 27, 10:36:12am
Author: JayBee
Subject: Hmmmmmm.
In reply to: Nell 's message, "Tuesday Roundup (why? Its Tuesday of course!)" on Tuesday, June 27, 08:52:53am

I'd love to have you steer me to where this positive take on Paul was going on in the fandom, because everywhere *I* looked, he was pretty much universally seen as a bad guy. (I did see criticism of Nikita along the lines of "Why doesn't she just quit whining and do what Operations says," but I think it's important to point out that those arguments were never actually made in a way that indicated the proponent actually approved of Operations at *all*. Rather, the implicit theme underlying all of these arguments was: "Michael wouldn't complain or protest like that, and why can't Nikita follow his lead?")

Interestingly, some of my issues with Nikita arise from a kind of mirrored response of yours: not only the fandom, but in fact the canon source presented Nikita as the heroine and Paul as a villain. It was simply expected that the audience would accept this. The characteristics they shared (and there were *many*) were very clearly intended by TPTB to be flaws in Paul, but perfectly acceptable in Nikita. This kind of double-standard -- excusing behavior that would be criticized in anyone else just because a character is deemed the hero -- *really* irks me.

When I write Paul, I pretty much write him as an asshole. Because he was! I don't try to whitewash his behavior or excuse what I think are pretty glaring flaws. But once you accept that these *are* flaws, you can move on to exploring what might be interesting or even positive about the character. (And in his case, I think his essential cynicism and somewhat dark sense of humor make his flaws a little more palatable than I find them in Nikita, who's just so insufferably *earnest*. *Wince*)

However, I have made a few attempts at writing Nikita as well, and doing so has been quite helpful in my getting to the point where I find her less annoying. When I'm in control of how the character is presented, when I can write *her* as a bit of an asshole without having to excuse it because she's The Heroine (tm), she's much more pleasant to contemplate.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.