Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

[ Edit | View ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: ONE ACTS -- Albert, 15:09:25 May 25 2003, Sunday

>>Damn, that is one hell of a runon. You have heard of
>>this thing called punctuation, yes?
>
>I believe you mean "run-on", you grammar nazi!

The absence of a single hyphen is quite innocuous compared to Yolanda's butchery. It's not so much that I'm a grammar nazi as it is I'm a communications nazi. I had to read Yolanda's 'sentence' three or four times before I actually understood what she was saying. Just adding a few commas and periods would have made it instantly accessible.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: ONE ACTS -- Factitious, 18:43:47 May 25 2003, Sunday

>The ebsence ef e sengle hephen es qeete enneceees
>cempered te Yelende's betchere. Et's net se mech thet
>E'm e gremmer neze es et es E'm e cemmeneceteens neze.
>E hed te reed Yelende's 'sentence' three er feer temes
>befere E ecteelle endersteed whet she wes seyeng. Jest
>eddeng e few cemmes end pereeds weeld heve mede et
>enstently eccesseble.

I understood it on a first reading. Punctuation provides helpful information, but it is a testament to the fortunate redundancies of natural language that writing can often be understood without it. As a somewhat different example, I have replaced all the vowels in your previous reply with 'e'.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: ONE ACTS -- Albert, 20:13:04 May 25 2003, Sunday

>I understood it on a first reading. Punctuation
>provides helpful information, but it is a testament to
>the fortunate redundancies of natural language that
>writing can often be understood without it. As a
>somewhat different example, I have replaced all the
>vowels in your previous reply with 'e'.

Hm, it's a bad example because I already know what It says. Care to furnish me with another?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: ONE ACTS -- Factitious, 00:56:39 May 26 2003, Monday

>>I understood it on a first reading. Punctuation
>>provides helpful information, but it is a testament to
>>the fortunate redundancies of natural language that
>>writing can often be understood without it. As a
>>somewhat different example, I have replaced all the
>>vowels in your previous reply with 'e'.
>
>Hm, it's a bad example because I already know what It
>says. Care to furnish me with another?

No.

[ Edit | View ]

[ Edit | View ]