[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 02:10:16 June 11 2003, Wednesday
Author: Maryna
Subject: More content~!
As a Factitious afficionado, I hereby demand more content, or at least the opportunity to edit Ben's content. An "I should probably go to bed earlier" is a cheap cop-out. And the summarily provided links only scream, "there's nothing more to see here on factitious.net, let's hop on over to a more interesting site!". Plus, for those of us on the Eastern Seaboard, the update times are inconvenient even for insomniacs such as myself. And all the rocks in FOMS are naked. I find this offensive and objectifying. Rocks are people, too! And what's the deal with peppers on pizza, anyway? And what's the deal with Ben's hair? And I'll show YOU an NPC, you goddamn hippies!
That is all.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[>
Rock Porn -- Albert, 03:27:21 June 11 2003, Wednesday
>> And all the rocks in FOMS are naked. I find this offensive and
>> objectifying. Rocks are people, too!
Well, that really depends on whether you can see their private rock bits. If you can't, then Ben could probably make the argument that it's artistic nudity, instead of pornographic. I personally can't really tell the head of a rock from its ass, but maybe that's just me.
[ Edit | View ]
[>
Re: More content~! -- Factitious, 03:35:02 June 11 2003, Wednesday
>As a Factitious afficionado, I hereby demand more
>content, or at least the opportunity to edit Ben's
>content.
That's an interesting idea. Ask me again on the 21st, and I may oblige you. An interactive feature could be a great deal of fun.
>An "I should probably go to bed earlier" is a
>cheap cop-out.
I completely agree. I wrote that entry in a hurry, late at night. I'll try to keep them up to the usual standards from now on.
>Plus, for those of us on the
>Eastern Seaboard, the update times are inconvenient
>even for insomniacs such as myself.
Check it at 4 pm each day. There will be something new each time, as long as I haven't missed an update. That's convenient enough, isn't it?
>And all the rocks
>in FOMS are naked. I find this offensive and
>objectifying. Rocks are people, too!
I'm trying to get an audience of rock fetishists.
>And what's the deal with Ben's hair?
Gavin says it's sexy.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
Re: More content~! -- Maryna, 03:53:47 June 11 2003, Wednesday
>>And what's the deal with Ben's hair?
>
>Gavin says it's sexy.
Cite??
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: More content~! -- Eric the brother with the good hair, 16:41:13 June 12 2003, Thursday
>>>And what's the deal with Ben's hair?
>>
>>Gavin says it's sexy.
>
>Cite??
bens hair sexy nooooooooooo.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: More content~! -- Maryna, 20:22:00 June 12 2003, Thursday
>>>>And what's the deal with Ben's hair?
>>>
>>>Gavin says it's sexy.
>>
>>Cite??
>
>
>bens hair sexy nooooooooooo.
I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: More content~! -- Mike, 02:21:32 June 13 2003, Friday
>I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?
Yes, but it doesn't.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: More content~! -- Albert, 04:49:28 June 13 2003, Friday
>>I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?
>
>Yes, but it doesn't.
See, that's what I'm talking about when I complain about the lack of punctuation. Two simple keystrokes would have been enough to make the meaning of the statement totally clear. Observe:
The original:
bens hair sexy nooooo
With question mark:
bens hair sexy? nooooo
There are still a few things wrong with it, but at least it actually communicates something.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: More content~! -- Factitious, 05:50:24 June 13 2003, Friday
>>>I'm confused. Was that supposed to mean something?
>>
>>Yes, but it doesn't.
>
>See, that's what I'm talking about when I complain
>about the lack of punctuation. Two simple keystrokes
>would have been enough to make the meaning of the
>statement totally clear. Observe:
>
>The original:
>bens hair sexy nooooo
>With question mark:
>bens hair sexy? nooooo
>
>There are still a few things wrong with it, but at
>least it actually communicates something.
Ben's hair: sexy. Nooooo?
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: More content~! -- Maryna, 13:32:58 June 13 2003, Friday
>Ben's hair: sexy. Nooooo?
Ben's hair: sexy. No? Oooo.
Eric, congratulations... in the future we have to avoid giving Ben the opportunity to twist our words to feed his own insatiable ego (he doesn't know yet that we're in cahoots)!
[ Edit | View ]
Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
