Re: Gallimard --

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject:

Re: Gallimard

Author:
jess

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:12:13 02/21/01 Wed
In reply to: Michelle 's message, "Re: Gallimard" on 22:14:32 02/18/01 Sun

I think it was also a way of contrasting Gallimard's relationship with Song and the already suffering one he had with his wife. Maybe it was also a way of showing how Song was supposed to be the subordinate player in their game: she would never cheat on G, whereas he can control their relationship by cheating on her. From this point of view, the end realization that Song was really the one controlling the relationship becomes that much more dramatic.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]