| Subject: Re: Final Paper Proposal: i also put it under final paper |
Author:
Prof Yun
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 11:34:55 04/29/01 Sun
In reply to:
Mandi Heller
's message, "Re: Final Paper Proposal: i also put it under final paper" on 18:08:14 04/27/01 Fri
Mandi,
This sounds promising. First, I would suggest that you tailor your idea to the revised assignment. If you didn't get the handout, ask your peers for a look at it. It now specifies the use of one text (not two, as you have below) and one piece of your work. Next, I would push you on this separation between "inside and outside." What are you calling inside and outside, in your understanding of it? Unpack those terms and attempt to lay out your arguments on this, based on the text you choose and your work. Is there really a clear division between our constructions and opinions of ourselves (supposedly "inside") and societal influence (supposedly "outside") upon this? How much of our "inside" thinking is really without "outside" influence? How does one divide the two? This is a place to begin refining your idea.
>Mandi Heller April 23, 2001
>Eng 451 Paper Proposal
>TTH 1:15-2:40
>
>
>
>
> The enemy of man or woman can be found within the
>mind, as well as outside the mind's gates. It is
>within the mind that a very formidable enemy may
>appear in the form of yourself such as, one's denial,
>one's uncontrolled anger, one's inability to control
>their emotions and one's inability to come to terms
>with the truth of a situation. On the outside painful
>revelations can come in the form of deception, hidden
>agendas and the loss of what one holds dear. It is my
>opinion that the enemy within the mind is more deadly
>than the enemy outside the mind's gates because one
>has a tendency to judge oneself more harshly than
>others, or causing themselves to go insane. The enemy
>outside our gates, is a tangible enemy, which one can
>see and feel and therefore better defend oneself.
>For, how can one defend themselves against themselves?
> However, either can be just as painful.
> In this paper I intend to look into the question of
>which is in truth more painful: the enemy of the mind
>to oneself or an outside entity to the mind? I will
>be comparing these ideas to the books, "Oleanna," by
>David Mamet and "M. Butterfly," by David Henry Hwang.
>I will then compare this idea and these two books with
>a scene composed by Maxie Lewis and myself on the gap
>and awkwardness of unsaid desire, critiquing all with
>questions of identity, responsibility, need, neglect
>and power.
> Questions that I will look to answer in "Oleanna"
>are: Is John his own worst enemy? Or is Carol his
>worst enemy? Why is John his worst enemy, or why is
>Carol his worst enemy? Why is John not able to
>control his anger in the end? Is this his worst
>slip-up in his fight within himself?
> Questions that I will also look into in "M.
>Butterfly" include: Is Gallimard his own worst enemy?
>Or is his worst enemy Song? Why is Gallimard his own
>worst enemy? Why would Song be Gallimard's worst
>enemy? Why (if Gallimard does) does Gallimard close
>his eyes to what Song is? Is Gallimard's worst
>weakness in observation or in a deception of himself?
> The questions that I will be looking to compare these
>above question to in my scene #2 are: What is her
>worst enemy herself or her boyfriend? Who is
>responsible for her current situation? Is she
>fighting monsters within herself or outside of herself
>that are the most painful?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 
