VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]
Subject: Re: Here's one for yuh.


Author:
Sam
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:13:07 05/14/03 Wed
In reply to: carolyn 's message, "Re: Here's one for yuh." on 11:23:07 05/14/03 Wed

>Honest to Dog, Sam, I had the exact same problem two
>days ago. Perhaps the adjective form of integrity

I love you, Carolyn. :)

>does not exist. Between you, me, and Sarah--all
>intelligent, people, we should know this word, if it
>existed. I searched every bit of my vocabulator, and
>couldn't come up with anything. I like "integriness"
>but that's also a noun. What about "integrilous"?
>That's an adjective. Damn our language...there just
>aren't enough words.

Bearing in mind that English has one of (if not _the_) largest vocabularies in the world.

Anyone got access to the OED? I bet there's some archaic word that fits. If not, I'm checking Klingon. I'm sure they've got something we can steal.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Here's one for yuh.


Author:
sarahchia
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:26:05 05/15/03 Thu

>>Honest to Dog, Sam, I had the exact same problem two
>>days ago. Perhaps the adjective form of integrity
>
>I love you, Carolyn. :)
>
>>does not exist. Between you, me, and Sarah--all
>>intelligent, people, we should know this word, if it
>>existed. I searched every bit of my vocabulator, and
>>couldn't come up with anything. I like "integriness"
>>but that's also a noun. What about "integrilous"?
>>That's an adjective. Damn our language...there just
>>aren't enough words.
>
>Bearing in mind that English has one of (if not _the_)
>largest vocabularies in the world.
>
>Anyone got access to the OED? I bet there's some
>archaic word that fits. If not, I'm checking Klingon.
>I'm sure they've got something we can steal.

Sam. You work for a *university*. I bet ya dollars to doughnuts that they subscribe to the online OED. U of I did, UNM did....just go to any computer that's linked into their network, and go to www.oed.com

You should probably be able to get right in.

I still stand by my initial reaction that it's commonly used as a clause "with integrity" rather than creating a word "integritiness".

But the OED definitely outranks us all.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Here's one for yuh.


Author:
Sam
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:45:27 05/15/03 Thu

>Sam. You work for a *university*. I bet ya dollars to
>doughnuts that they subscribe to the online OED. U of
>I did, UNM did....just go to any computer that's
>linked into their network, and go to www.oed.com

Ooo! I did not know that you could get into the oed site based on IP address. The only oed I ever used at UofI was the commandline unix one and I know we don't have that here.

HA!

HA-HA!

Integrous:

[f. L. integer, integr- + -OUS.]

Obs. rare.

Marked by integrity; = INTEGRE, INTEGRIOUS.

1657 W. MORICE Coena quasi Def. xx. 174 That an action be good, the
cause ought to be integrous.

>I still stand by my initial reaction that it's
>commonly used as a clause "with integrity" rather than
>creating a word "integritiness".

Yes, indeed, that is how it is commonly used. That was never in debate. I was looking for an _uncommon_ usage and found it. Woo!

>But the OED definitely outranks us all.

*BOOM!*

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.