VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:51:11 05/16/03 Fri
Author: DammitBoy!
Author Host/IP: cache-dl06.proxy.aol.com / 205.188.209.42
Subject: Re: unless of course it was criminal as in the case of sexual harassment
In reply to: Khronos 's message, "Of course..." on 10:52:41 05/15/03 Thu

>it is wrong.

I'm not talking morals, I'm talking federal statutes.


>my point was that just because he has an extramarital affair alone isn't totally damning.

Who cares if he was fucking around on Hillary. Having sex with a subordinate in a federal building, while at work is a crime. A federal crime.

Having other federal employees cover it up is a crime, a federal crime.

He was guilty of sexual harrassment, guilty of fostering a hostile work environment. Guilty of obstruction of justice. Guilty of lying under oath. Guilty of abuse of power.

It wasn't about sex numbnuts, it was about the laws he broke!


>getting your dick sucked doesn't necessarily constitute sexual harassment.

Under the conditions of - when, how, where, and who it took place with, in Bill Clinton's case, it most assuredly is sexual harrassment.

The republicans were just too stupid to make the right case against him.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.