VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, October 23, 11:29:35pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Monday, October 21, 12:59:15pm
Author: Same Old Story
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 90.241.124.131
Subject: The Tete one, whilst the foul was the same, is probably the only one were its not a sending off, as he wasn't going towards goal. But it was a foul, and should have been a penalty. And maybe thats the rub. He's given the foul because it was outside the box and didn't have to give a penalty. If either the Tete or Traore ones happen outside, i bet they get given.
In reply to: G 's message, "It is ridiculous the inconsistency...look at what the Villa player got second booking (and sending off for) on Saturday..." on Monday, October 21, 12:46:27pm


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.