VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:14:15 12/15/04 Wed
Author: 地球人
Subject: 小弟同意本港馬匹平均水準比以往提高,可能取消第六班的原因吧...但一點要注意的是:低班水準提升的速度比高班水準的提升速度快,連第五班的紀錄時間比最佳時間慢不了多少(明顯場地作怪);[逍遙谷]在主場跑凱旋門大賽才會跑第六o
In reply to: Lincoln 's message, "有一點最不明白,就是愚弟同意本港高班馬質素是比以前提高,但想不到會拿作與歐洲先進地區相提並論.精英大師實力確比歐洲短途馬好,但不應單用一匹馬來評估.以香港瓶作例,頭馬鳳凰烈焰在歐洲甚至全球最高水準的2400M大賽英皇喬治六世及女皇伊莉沙伯鑽石錦標是完全陪跑,第二名的眼中金更與高多芬團體今年的一級大軍長老及緬甸古廟等相距甚遠,第三的逍遙谷已是最好,能在高水準大賽得五,六名,但牠們仍足以包辦香港瓶前三名呢!" on 01:48:25 12/14/04 Tue


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.