VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:48:25 12/14/04 Tue
Author: Lincoln
Subject: 有一點最不明白,就是愚弟同意本港高班馬質素是比以前提高,但想不到會拿作與歐洲先進地區相提並論.精英大師實力確比歐洲短途馬好,但不應單用一匹馬來評估.以香港瓶作例,頭馬鳳凰烈焰在歐洲甚至全球最高水準的2400M大賽英皇喬治六世及女皇伊莉沙伯鑽石錦標是完全陪跑,第二名的眼中金更與高多芬團體今年的一級大軍長老及緬甸古廟等相距甚遠,第三的逍遙谷已是最好,能在高水準大賽得五,六名,但牠們仍足以包辦香港瓶前三名呢!
In reply to: Lincoln 's message, "出現不同意見是正常不過的事,例如明德在香港瓶如不受阻,有朋友可以覺得會贏馬,可能有些覺得跑第五或第十.又可以認為勁將軍2400M更好,這點愚弟完全理解.個人盡量客觀分析,勁將軍那路程最好現階段未能肯定,因只在港跑過兩場,奧馬田也贏過覺士盾,但於香港杯直路初已缺力,澳紐馬不能單用賽績計是真正長途馬,宜每匹摸索.另外愚弟也承認風雲小子在直路曾受阻,但以個人對賽馬的速度感有限所知,這影響怎也不至於有五個馬位之差而說牠因此失掉冠軍,能追及第四名的機會只得四成." on 01:19:25 12/14/04 Tue


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.