VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:18:34 05/23/04 Sun
Author: IVAN
Subject: 最後一點就是，有錢人能利用權力左右政策，可以導致他們不景氣時向市民開刀，但同樣地大家也不能保證他們景氣時會回饋社會，造福人群。一間公司有盈利時不代表他們不會減薪裁員。指意富人的良心去解決經濟，不如從改造社會階層著手，可能還比較有效。
In reply to: IVAN 's message, "香港經濟起飛時代，以我所知可能是70-80年代。當時一個工廠工人串膠花都不愁依食。那時候我不太清楚香港的階層分佈，但是我認為小市民能夠生活安心，主要是增加富人的人數，而不是富人的財產。李嘉誠回歸後身家升了不知幾倍，按道理香港的經濟應該是會比回歸前好，可是事與願違。因此我認為要解決經濟的問題，首先就應該從增加富人的人數，其次是減輕貧富差距。可是現今香港經濟政策過份右傾，貧富差距自回歸後傾向惡化，中小企走的路越來越難行。只是讓幾個人富起來是不能解決經濟問題的。" on 15:15:56 05/23/04 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.