VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456[7]8910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:32:13 05/24/04 Mon
Author: 旺財
Subject: 如為富者不仁, 就算用法例監管仍會不仁, 利用法例漏洞. 七八十年代之成功, 在於政府之積極不干預經濟政策. 現時那些表面上保障打工仔權益之法例, 一方面增加營商環境之困難, 加速小商戶倒閉, 另一方面對大機構大富商跟本無影響. 月薪二千五百元都有人做, 証明低低下階層人力資源過盛, 如再設立最低工資之類的法例, 將迫使資金外流, 到時人人乞米. 所謂合理, 在於市場供求平衡, 二千五百元月薪都有人做, 只可怪人口過盛. 希望大家明白.
In reply to: 路過 's message, "Re: 理論本身無問題,沒有富裕商家,平民百姓的確無好日子過;但現在的問題是商家在惡劣環境下賺取的金錢比最好時差不了太多,但在這個情況下,平民仍然要承受二千五百元月薪,不要說是你情我願,沒有高壓的管理層,坊間搵工仍然不易﹙或歸邊﹚,相信僱員亦會反抗,試問這種為富不仁,或者退而求其次,俾少少粥水俾平民食,點解都要分咁少?我地要求唔多,合理咋,但看看西鐵同港燈點講野,我地平民仲有冇希望?所以理論成立同實際情況根本就係兩件事,希望旺財兄可以明白" on 15:59:02 05/23/04 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:




Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.