VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wed, Apr 23 2025, 20:46:09Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: 唉!作為一位「堂主」,居然......


Author:
不知所謂
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:16:34 01/17/04 Sat
In reply to: 堂主 's message, "Re: 一點回應" on 22:35:47 01/17/04 Sat

其實,作為一位主,除非「危急關頭」,「無可選擇」,否則,根本不宜在「自己地頭」作出評論!

雖然「堂主」作出聲明/道歉,但也就有「解釋即掩飾」之嫌!第一:就那篇「轉載」,我絕對覺得「真實程度大過虛構」,或許「堂主」會堅持:「之前太多類似事件!」但我仍絕對相信之前有更多「留言」的可信性是更低,更離譜的!那為何「堂主」不一一加以評論或批判?是對我們的「Miss」特別敏感,還是心血來潮「口痕」呢?唉......

再者,那麼狠地批判人家的英文水平,試問何德何能呀?又有這樣的必要嗎?還有,該篇「文章」真的那麼不濟嗎?作為一篇簡單交待的「便條」,究竟要怎樣寫才對?「堂主」會作示範嗎?可能「堂主」是舊生,往日學生的英文水平或會比我們這群高中生,甚至我們的老師高,那麼,不如「堂主」自己或找其他人作一篇表達同樣信息,而又似高中英文老師英文水平的參考文章,「堂主」能應允嗎?唉......

「堂主」呀,「堂主」!我個人對你真的很失望啊!或許,你會選擇不作回應(這可能是好事,於你來說是正確的決定!),但若果你仍心有不甘,敬請小心回應,「落筆」之前最好想清楚,當初留言時心中所思所想,否則,再作回應,真的只會令你的「支持者」更加:「唉......」

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: Re: 一點回應(唉......)


Author:
不知所謂
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:34:12 01/17/04 Sat

「以印象中濟記中四至中七的英文教師之水平作準,經比較後得出來的結論」
請問「堂主」的印象是如何建立的呢?難道真的有很多「濟記」的高中英文老師顯露過他們的英文寫作水平?那「堂主」真的「見識廣博」了!可否舉出一些例子以說明之呢?還有,你所說的「比較」準則是如何設定的?啊!你還說是「結論」呢!真「權威」!不過,你是有提及自己是以「印象」來比較的,那麼,你的「印象」是何等的有「殺傷力」啊!

順帶一提,「堂主」,「編」和「篇」是不一樣的,錯這個別字不知會否是「濟記」初中學生的毛病呢?啊!你或許並非真「堂主」!要知道,假扮別人是不應該的啊!:(

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.