VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Re: "We're Winning the WBIT."


Author:
An Observer
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:57:37 04/04/26 Sat
In reply to: An Observer 's message, ""We're Winning the WBIT."" on 11:52:57 03/15/26 Sun

Well, well, well.

We all know the expression, "Such-and-such statement did not age well."

Perri Page's statement aged VERY well.

Congratulations to Perri and the Columbia Lions!

I thought that the Lions' goal should be to be the last Ivy League team playing in 2026. Mission accomplished, and the team was playing in APRIL, 2026!

Brava, ladies.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: "We're Winning the WBIT."


Author:
An Observer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:49:43 04/15/26 Wed

Before this 2026 season recedes from our short-term memories to. . . er. . . whatever follows short-term memory, I just wanted to point out that this year's campaign had something for everybody.

First, the Ivy League champion reminded us what we loved about the old "14-game tournament," which many were sad to see go. To my eye, Columbia was a better team than Princeton. But the Tigers showed up ready for boxing every time that the bell was rung. That's what discipline and focus is all about.

Princeton truly was worthy of being the outright champion. They took on all comers and were the only drinker left standing when the bar fight was over.

Harvard showed that, on any given night, they could take down anybody. And they did, with the exception of Princeton, which beat them 3 times out of 3. But all three games went the distance including one that went more than the distance.

Harvard showed that they have arrived and taken up residence at the top of the league.

But the most eye-opening performance may have been Columbia's run to the top of the WBIT. The Lionesses were not able to do what Princeton did, show up ready for work every time they were asked to put on their hard hats.

Nevertheless, when the Lionesses got angry, they were the best team in the conference. The show they put on for us at the very end of March into April is as impressive a run as, well, I don't know. I'm not sure there's a precedent. The Lionesses weren't playing NCAA opponents, but they were steamrolling people. There was an emotional edge for a longer sustained run than I can remember out of any Ivy women's team.

What a season. Princeton is every bit the worthy outright champion and ILT champion. Brava, Tigers. Harvard, you backed down from nobody and took down Columbia twice. Lionesses, you gave us a show we have seen before.

What a season.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Technically true, but...


Author:
Go Green
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:46:28 04/16/26 Thu


Some of the teams that Columbia beat (convincingly) were teams that many believed should have been given NCAA bids.

https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/4-teams-snubbed-ncaa-womens-014232945.html

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Technically true, but...


Author:
An Observer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:06:51 04/17/26 Fri

Fair point. Columbia's opponents were almost by definition in the "first 31 out."

So the Lionesses were playing what amounted to Dayton-level contests against some teams which just missed an #11 seed play-in game and others which might have been headed for a #12 or #13 seed. So they were competitive opponents but not, say, the #8 seed that Princeton faced out of the Big XII.

The S-curve in women's college basketball is a lot steeper than in men's. The same four teams reached this year's Final Four as last season's. The best teams are an order of magnitude better than the merely good. They really do re-load. This as opposed to, say, the Michigan men's team, which has to buy all its players brand new every season.

Indeed, one could make an argument that the best Ivy performance of the last several years was the Tigers hanging with this year's national champion UCLA at Pauley Pavilion in the last season of the Kaitlyn Chen era when Lauren Betts was already there as a sophomore transfer from Stanford. That's how much better UConn, UCLA and South Carolina are than the rest of the pack.

Princeton led inside the last minute and Chen missed a potential game-tying three-pointer at the buzzer in a 77-74 loss.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.