Re: Of course, in other contexts... -- <h1>IVY LEAGUE SPORTS BOARD</h1>

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: Of course, in other contexts...

Author:
Bengal

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:50:20 05/22/24 Wed
In reply to: observer 's message, "Re: Of course, in other contexts..." on 14:42:58 05/22/24 Wed

Thanks. But the issue I have been addressing, which your statement evades, is what games should be required to qualify for the NCAAS in various Ivy sports, i.e. which games should count? Just the regular season record? A playoff or tiebreaker in tie situations where there is no Ivy tournament? An Ivy tournament? What do you think?

BTW, I am unaware that any Ivy championship eligible sport uses a divisional system today with different or more games played against some Ivy rivals than others, as Ivy baseball once did, which necessarily presented a different scenario. I might be missing something there. Or where strike induced adjustments impacted post-season bids.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Most Valid Way of Determining Best Team

Author:
Boston Lion
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:50:38 05/23/24 Thu

Fully concur. The issue really IS, as stated by Bengal, "which games should be required to qualify for the NCAAs in various Ivy sports, i.e. which games should count? Just the regular season record? A playoff or tiebreaker in tie situations where there is no Ivy tournament? An Ivy tournament?"

Examining that, one way of looking at this is to ask, holding all other things (e.g., injuries) equal, which of the of the following is likely to reveal which team is better:

1. Having two teams play each other 1,000 times; or
2. Having two teams play each other only once.

IMHO, the question answers itself.

And by holding all other things equal, I don't mean to disregard the effect of injuries. What I mean is that if one seeks to determine, in the purest way, which team is best, assuming for the sake of that determination that all contenders had either no injuries or were dented equivalently by injuries, what would the result be?