Re: Transferable or Non- Transferable... -- United Hunters of Florida (UHF)

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

06/13/26 1:02:47pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12/ 6/07 9:30:24am
Author: Kenny
Subject: Re: Transferable or Non- Transferable...
In reply to: markm 's message, "Transferable or Non- Transferable..." on 12/ 5/07 8:24:37pm

>I've gotten alot of e-mails on this, transferable has
>gotten the consensis but i can only speak for myself,
>I want some changes made, but not at the expense of
>hunters or Myself loosing hunting days in the woods...
>if we look at how many WMAs are Quota Only areas, how
>many days they allow hunting on these areas, Most of
>you would see why i'm against a FLAT non-transferable
>system!
>
>As a Board member of the United Hunters of Florida, I
>have to make sure the Members are not going to loose
>any hunting thru rules the FWC make good intentions or
>not, you can be sure all the board members are doing
>the same!
>
>We have had four Town hall meetings, hunters have had
>a chance to attend and voice their opinion, the UHF
>really push for that, we wanted hunters to have a
>chance to do that... what happens next, I would hope
>is this group of Stakeholders go back and try and find
>a better solution, something in the middle, something
>we all can agree on, "ya right", it's going to take
>alot of thought, hard work and it must not be on the
>backs of Florida hunters alone, the FWC has got to
>CONTRIBUTE something to these changes, Manned check
>stations is one thing i would like to see, on all WMAs!
>
>Thanks to guys like Gladeshunter, Keith and a few
>others who openly voiced their opinion either way,
>that's what our boys are fighting for today, that
>RIGHT, the ability to DEBATE in an open forum, that's
>why hunting will never die, people like us who aren't
>afraid to stand up! We'll find a common ground on this
>and many other issues, hunting will go on for
>generations because of our confictions, that's why the
>UHF was formed!
>
>Mark

Mark very well said. We do need to improve on what we have but NONTRANSFERABLE is not the answer here. I keep saying we are all for more hunting opportunities and nontransferable will take opportunities from hunters.
I'm heading to citrus this weekend because me and my Bud Chris had two permits givin to us. Other wise I would not get this opportunity to hunt if they were nontransferable.

Keep the permits transferable.
Keep the hunters in the woods.
keep building opportunities.

Thanks for your support on this.

Kenny

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]