VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, May02, 01:44:pm
Author: a Bigger clique
Subject: Re: Democratic primary candidates
In reply to: random thoughts 's message, "Re: Democratic primary candidates" on Tuesday, May02, 10:14:am

A vetted immigration policy that is balanced to a nation's on down to its individual municipalitys' gdp and carrying capacity IS welcome. Fundamentally, this 'policy' is deliberately managed. Practically, it's does not require hard math or deep socioeconomic analysis...revenue to expenses, assets to liabilities. When this policy fails to keep the balance in check it negatively effects the social economic conditions of the current population, to include the newly arrived. That's not welcome. That's cruel. Again, it's not rocket science. My comment addressed an example of a 'policy failed', in fact designed to fail, aka "a strategy". My comment clearly stated that the 'welcoming community' policy was to -continue- with this "strategy", implying it is nothing New and, as a strategy it requires complicity. I refuse to believe that the people running this country and/or its states, counties and municipalities are or have been become ignorant of basic math and social science. It is a top down system. It is a Central Plan to the extent that a state, county or municipality does not, can not, despite allll the poilitical theatre, operate in a vaccumm. Part of it is the blame game, in the inverse. Bottom up. It's not ignorance and it's not ad hoc. The Central Plan requires complicity and compliance. Most of all it requires an exponential 'flow'...decades of climbing global debt juxtaposed with decades of declining purchasing power... for all of us. Well, 99.09% of us. It's hitting a wall. Enter a Central bank digital ledger. Keyword 'Central'. Yet, most will still think along "poltical" lines with the belief it will maintain their 'social credits' with the now one and only lender and buyer'of last resort. It'll probably play out that way. Initially.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.