VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:11:22 08/04/99 Wed
Author: NSW Long (Sylvester Cat)
Subject: Tree Root Power???

I quote from the notes which we received today which are based on Dr Chatterjea's transparencies. "FELLING OF TREES -> rotten roots decreases (c) cohesive strength, removal of trees reduce normal stress (load)." That point was presumably raised to aid in understanding slackening of soil particle cohesiveness. However, from what I have heard from Dr Chatterjea today and now from reading her notes, discrepancies surface, apparently.

My understanding is that tree roots (living) have some kind of holding power on the soil such that the tree roots prevent the soil from becoming less cohesive, unconsolidated. In this respect, my understanding needs to be reinforced from readers and from Dr Chatterjea as to how the roots have such special holding power. Therefore, it makes sense to me, at least at this stage that dead roots from felled trees can no longer hold the soil together and so the soil becomes unconsolidated.

So, how is it that the point of "removal of trees reduce normal stress (load) comes in?" The question is which of the component actually reduces soil consolidation (1) or (2) or (3), which is both? Point(1) being the removal of trees which leads to reduction of surface stress leading to soil becoming loose and that results in unconsolidation of soil and therefore is a prime candidate for water action to act as a trigger for gravity to lead to landslides. Point(2) being the loss of tree roots as the factor in soil unconsolidation. How exactly, I still do not know. Point (3) being both points working in synthesis to result in soil unconsolidation.

Any answers for this little small query???

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.