VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, June 19 2008, 0:27:41 GMT-10
Author: Anthony
Subject: Re: DRUGS
In reply to: Steve Betts 's message, "Re: DRUGS" on Wed, April 09 2008, 9:33:26 GMT-10

>Steve,
>
>Referees are not required to undertake drug tests at
>any level of the game.
>
>I know that the ARL is considering introducing drug
>testing for officials. The refereeing fraternity would
>be in favour of the tests if they were introduced.
>
>Steve Betts
>CEO
>ARLRA

Im for it simply because the road to becoming a NRL referee is a competitive one and fairness should be applied to it just like with the players. Referees should be awarded better games and movement thru the ranks as a result of natural hard work, not thru doping and drug aided hard work.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.