[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 06:45:21am 12/17/05 Sat,
Author: JoeStag
Subject: Expectations vs Goals, and x's and o's
In reply to:
ol' salty
's message, "Re: Question for JS" on 08:30:22pm 12/16/05 Fri,
Salt, as I said before my expectations are that we are top 4 in the MAAC almost every year, and win the MAAC once every 4 on the average. That is what I feel is accepetable. I also think thats our goal of most Tier1 and Tier2 teams at Fairfield. BTW I do not think any MAAC School besides Lasalle has acheived that goal.
But I am not content with that. I want to be in a league with schools that we compete with academcally for students, and that is with Fordham, Holy Cross, Providence, Villanova, Loyola, St Joes and the NYC MAAC schools like Manhattan and Iona. I think our goal should be to be successfull in a league like that.
But we are in the MAAC, and thats what we have to compete with, and thats where we have to be successfull, before we think of moving up. Our recruiting is somewhat resticted by the league we are in. Sure there are exception recruits like Deng Gai, but for the most part AAU and HS coaches tell kids they are a Big East, A10, or MAAC level recruit.
Can we pull of Gonzaga. I would love to ..... but there are probably 100-150 Mid Majors that are striving for that goal, with only Gonazaga suceeding, and 4 or 5 others making a good push..... to be much better than their league.
As far as TOT as an x's and o's guy. I feel he is a very good defensive coach, and needs to be better on the offensive end. But I do not think x's and o's play a big part in Basketball coaching..... we are not talking football here. I think its more important that a coach prepares his players to play hard, to play as a team, and play smart. Execution is much more important thatn x's and o's.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [> [>
Re: Expectations vs Goals, and x's and o's -- GuyF, 01:53:56pm 12/17/05 Sat, [1]
"Our recruiting is somewhat resticted by the league we are in."
JoeStag, no offense, but this is ridiculous. Generally speaking, the MAAC schools all recruit from the same pool and level of players. Each school has had exceptions--both positive and negative--but to suggest that you guys are struggling because you're in the MAAC makes no sense.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: Expectations vs Goals, and x's and o's -- JoeStag, 04:42:28pm 12/17/05 Sat, [1]
GuyF,
Maybe I was not clear....... I was not suggesting that our current issues are due to restictions on MAAC recruiting.
I agree 100 that all MAAC teams go after the basic same pool of players because AAU and HS coaches tell players they are MAAC players.
My point was that it is very difficult for a MAAC team to be consistntly better than all the rest of the teams in the league ...... Like Gonzaga..... for the same reason you suggested, All MAAC teams are after the same pool of players. Its not like that for Gonzaga.
Lasalle was probably the only MAAC School that was consistently better than other MAAC schools. And Penn/Princeton have ruled the ivy.... but in most Mid Major leagues, it is cyclical of which teams are the best.
So I agree with you.... may point was not clear.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Expectations vs Goals, and x's and o's -- GuyF, 10:45:08pm 12/17/05 Sat, [1]
Gonna disagree with you again, in three areas:
1. LaSalle was only consistently better in its last 4 years of MAAC play. They were not better from the league's inception through the year before Simmons got there.
2. Can't compare this situation to the Ivy League, because of the scholarships issue. Totally unique situation.
3. In the past 10 years or so, Iona, Manhattan and Siena have been the best programs in this league. It has to be said that they have been "consistently better" than most of the rest of the league.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Expectations vs Goals, and x's and o's -- JoeStag, 05:19:23pm 12/18/05 Sun, [1]
I am having trouble explaining myself on this point. My point is that Gonzaga has consistently been much better than their 2nd best team in their league. They are so much better than their league, its not even close.
There has been no MAAC team that has been that much better than the league for a long stretch. Manhattan had a good 2 year run, but not Gonzaga-like.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
