VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Dec 26 2024, 8:36:37, ThuLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678 ]
Subject: 笑下啦地球人-笑死冇命賠


Author:
紅兔
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:59:06 06/27/05 Mon

轉載-四將論 (改自六國論)
中學學D課文係咁用:
比賽包艇,非人不勁,賽不善,弊在有丁。有丁而分虧,包艇之道也。或曰:全組敗北,率有丁耶?
曰:不錯者以錯者喪。蓋失強援,不能獨完,故曰弊在有丁也。

丁以冷淡之外,小則著草,大則讓賽。較丁之所失,與隊友所失者,其實多倍;隊友之所得,與丁某
所得者,其實亦多倍。則隊之所大忌,隊員之所大患,固必在丁矣。思厥眾隊員,暴暖氣,壓按鈕,
以有尺寸之分;丁某視之不甚惜,舉以予人,如棄草芥。上題蝕四分,下題讓五分,然後得一室咒罵。
起視四境,而題目又至矣。然則隊員之分有限,愚丁之笨無窮;奪之彌繁,敗之愈急,故不賽而強弱、
勝負已判矣。至於包艇,理固宜然。友人云:「以分予丁,猶抱薪救火;薪不盡,火不滅。」此言得之。

會長未嘗出賽,終繼遷怒於丁,何哉?蝕分而不助隊友也。隊友包艇,丁亦不免矣。臻、木二將,稍
有理智,能守其分,義不效丁。是故木雖少分而避綁,斯用腦之效也。至波以丁某為將,始速禍焉。
波嘗兩戰於賽,一良而一可。後賽擊會者再,熊人連卻之;洎熊已離校,比賽為恣A惜其用人而不終
也。且臻、木處丁愚笨喪分之際,可謂勢單力弱,包艇而回,誠不得已。

向使三員各愛其分,會長勿附於熊,丁某不行,熊人猶在,則勝負之數,存亡之理,當與人相較,或
未易量。嗚呼!以予丁之位,封天下之良將;以練丁之力,培天下之奇才:并力南嚮,則吾恐各隊食
之不得下咽也。悲夫!有如此之勢,而為丁某愚笨之所劫,上扣下減,以趨於敗。為會者,無使為愚
笨之所劫哉!

夫三將與丁皆學生,其勢強於丁,而猶有不用而勝之之勢。苟以其絕對之分,而從比賽當日之勢,是
又在多隊上矣!

一件無言既事既有言回應

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: 其實有什麼好笑?


Author:
?
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:43:55 06/29/05 Wed

?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: 笑死了


Author:
膠仔糖
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:02:08 06/29/05 Wed

笑死了

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: 笑下啦地球人-笑死冇命賠


Author:
紅兔
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:47:11 06/30/05 Thu

我抄埋作者既解釋你就明。

首段解釋為何弊在有丁。比賽中,我六十七,伍尚四十三,森林木九,而佢既分數係人人得而扁之既負一百零四分。(尾二同學負三十幾分,由當時數學學會會長森林木計到既 expectaion 係 -41.25。) 出丁冇出其他人,而丁又不斷答錯拉分,故謂失強援。比賽前著草後態度不瞅不睬,悔意久奉。稍有理智一句暗寸D同學冇咩理智。一個有理智既人都無可能錯咁多題。負分時都要收手啦。佢皮都唔收下。森林木得九分都可以避免比熊人綁係樹上面。最絕既係佢比賽後棄隊潛逃。從任何角度睇,丁某都係論罪當綁。因為佢既事跡,森林木叫佢做 D 同學。D同學實在太勁。波波夫咁少發惡既都比佢撩起把火。值得注意既係「隊友既街,丁亦不免矣。」既丁亦不免矣指既唔係包艇,而係我同森林木成日講既有D野真係冇得慳謘A即係叫熊人將佢綁係樹上面。後面講波會長有玩過比賽,熊人係天文學會主將 (後賽擊會者再,熊人連卻之)。佢畢業後人才開始凋零,比賽成績失色。(洎熊已離校,比賽為) 如果唔出D同學,波波夫出賽,唔同熊人一齊坐觀眾席。又或者熊人未畢業,我地好難輸。個比賽答對五分,錯扣四分。經統計後,比賽有五十條。佢答琱K題,答錯三十一題,淨錯廿六題。我地並得出以下結果。出賽前我地扑濕佢,單手讓賽,排十幾。將佢個分 absolute驉A好似排第五度。六名或以內有獎,我就可以榮休。(竊笑) 呢個就解釋最尾個段。我當日講如果丁某負少少就拋佢落西貢沿海算喇。多D就順手D拋落維港啦。不過好似佢咁負法。我地不如一人出幾蚊,夾錢的佢去荃灣,拋佢落醉酒灣個貨物起卸區好啦。有睇過機場鐵路既環評都知果度有幾污糟。有D野真係冇得慳謘C呢件事就係促成我作「叫熊人將佢綁係樹上面」(九八度九方個紹字係正綁字前面) 呢句名句。是項聲明已獲森林木證實。佢證實鬙y野係我係D同學單野後作既。呢句好快就成為天文學會中人既流行句。

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: 笑下啦地球人-笑死冇命賠


Author:
hkgolden
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:21:03 07/01/05 Fri



[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: 笑下啦地球人-笑死冇命賠


Author:
知音人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:06:14 07/01/05 Fri

真的很滑稽!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 虷狟徽華⑩芄倨竹蚚攲


Author:
?埻阹ま
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:26:27 07/02/05 Sat

>淩腔竭賑儉!
蹎譜, 虷侚飲徽~

慇慇慇...

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: 笑下啦地球人-笑死冇命賠


Author:
MT
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:02:51 07/13/05 Wed

http://ihome.cuhk.edu.hk/~s035790/astroquest/score.html
http://ihome.cuhk.edu.hk/~s035790/astroquest/score2.html

>轉載-四將論 (改自六國論)
>中學學D課文係咁用:
>比賽包艇,非人不勁,賽不善,弊在有丁。有丁而分虧,包艇?>完D也。或曰:全組敗北,率有丁耶?
>曰:不錯者以錯者喪。蓋失強援,不能獨完,故曰弊在有丁也?>C
>
>丁以冷淡之外,小則著草,大則讓賽。較丁之所失,與隊友所?>◥怴A其實多倍;隊友之所得,與丁某
>所得者,其實亦多倍。則隊之所大忌,隊員之所大患,固必在?>B矣。思厥眾隊員,暴暖氣,壓按鈕,
>以有尺寸之分;丁某視之不甚惜,舉以予人,如棄草芥。上題?>k四分,下題讓五分,然後得一室咒罵。
>起視四境,而題目又至矣。然則隊員之分有限,愚丁之笨無窮?>F奪之彌繁,敗之愈急,故不賽而強弱、
>勝負已判矣。至於包艇,理固宜然。友人云:「以分予丁,猶?>篪~救火;薪不盡,火不滅。」此言得之。
>
>會長未嘗出賽,終繼遷怒於丁,何哉?蝕分而不助隊友也。隊?>穸]艇,丁亦不免矣。臻、木二將,稍
>有理智,能守其分,義不效丁。是故木鬗痐嬰蚆袑j,斯用腦?>妙臚]。至波以丁某為將,始速禍焉。
>波嘗兩戰於賽,一良而一可。後賽擊會者再,熊人連卻之;洎?>竣w離校,比賽為恣A惜其用人而不終
>也。且臻、木處丁愚笨喪分之際,可謂勢單力弱,包艇而回,?>菑ㄠo已。
>
>向使三員各愛其分,會長勿附於熊,丁某不行,熊人猶在,則?>茩t之數,存亡之理,當與人相較,或
>未易量。嗚呼!以予丁之位,封天下之良將;以練丁之力,培?>悀U之奇才:并力南嚮,則吾恐各隊食
>之不得下咽也。悲夫!有如此之勢,而為丁某愚笨之所劫,上?>岸U減,以趨於敗。為會者,無使為愚
>笨之所劫哉!
>
>夫三將與丁皆學生,其勢強於丁,而猶有不用而勝之之勢。苟?>H其絕對之分,而從比賽當日之勢,是
>又在多隊上矣!
>
>一件無言既事既有言回應

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.