Re: W John Hewlett..SC..92 Mustang .469 8.32 @ 184 -- ORSCA EZ STREET RACER BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:54:24 12/08/04 Wed
Author: John Kolivas
Subject: Re: W John Hewlett..SC..92 Mustang .469 8.32 @ 184
In reply to: Jake 's message, "Re: W John Hewlett..SC..92 Mustang .469 8.32 @ 184" on 05:47:58 12/08/04 Wed

>>obviously you missed the point, AGAIN!!! hopefully
>>others that actually matter got it.
>
>
>Your point is moot! All the rule makers have to do is
>look at every Street legal racing organization in the
>country to see that Turbo/intercooled cars need severe
>limitations or that will be the only combination in
>the class. Therefore the class will die due to low car
>counts.
>
>In regards to Danny's Mustang: That car could actually
>60 foot quicker with 200-300lbs of weight added to the
>rear of the car. Weight in the right place helps
>60-foot times not hurts them. The added weight will
>kill some MPH, but in the REAL world could actually
>help his 60's. Besides that you just proved my point.
>If the BB&T car is 300lbs heavier and running 149 MPH
>in the 1/8th compared to Danny/Don Gingrinch's 135 MPH
>then the turbo's should damn sure be limited severely.
>Since the BB&T has damn near a 15 MPH advantage in the
>1/8th mile. Which shows how much more power they are
>making and the potential that the Big Turbo
>combination's have.
>
>I say only allow a 82 MM turbo with air to liquid
>intercooler. Anything over 82 MM must be air to
>air, non enhanced, with a maximum of 91 MM. No necked
>down turbos/superchargers. Measurement will be at the
>leading edge of the compressor wheel where it meets
>the compressor inlet housing. All incoming air is
>required to travel through the inducer from the front
>or leading edge of the inducer and cannot be
>introduced to the compressor blades through ports or
>slots of any kind.
>
>F2, D3R prochargers allowed air to air intercoolers
>only. F1�s or smaller can have liquid intercoolers

Guess what Jake.....it aint gonna happen!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: W John Hewlett..SC..92 Mustang .469 8.32 @ 184 -- steven r., 20:56:18 12/08/04 Wed