Re: Happy Father's Day Judge James D. Humphrey -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: Happy Father's Day Judge James D. Humphrey

Author:
To Pot-Kettle

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:02:40 07/06/14 Sun
In reply to: Dan Brewington 's message, "Happy Father's Day Judge James D. Humphrey" on 22:21:24 06/15/14 Sun

"I don't know what you are reading but I never said Brewington lied or was wrong about statements he has made."

I believe your first statement was "This guy calling other people paranoid??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA"

The definition of paranoia is having or showing an unreasonable feeling that people are trying to harm you, do not like you, etc. You accuse Brewington of being paranoid and then laugh at him. Then you flip flop and say Brewington is correct in what he is saying so by your own account he is NOT paranoid. That would make you just another person who is trying to attack the man's credibility because you do not like him. Why do you attack someone because they defend their rights to the US constitution? And what information do you have that we do not know. What is the status of Brewington's ability to see his children? Are you privy to that information? The question remains, what is his ex doing? He was cleared on the charges she filed against him in Cincinnati. He has never been held in contempt despite her efforts. She testified against him in the criminal case in both the grand jury and the trial. She told Kreinhop Brewington threatened her with violence on more than one occasion yet made no mention of such to the family courts or in her Cincinnati criminal complaint against Brewington. An Brewington went to jail for attempted obstructing of justice where some of the evidence used to convict him was he filed too many motions in a divorce case. Why would this man ever want to step into another courtroom in his life? And then there are people like you who are laughing and second guessing the guy. Then you try to bail out like, "oh he's not wrong he should just not fight a system because it takes too much time to correct." You're right. He should just waltz back into a courtroom and let his ex and the courts take aim at him again and then you will be back to critique him for standing up for his rights. He should just accept he was unjustly imprisoned for 2.5 years and there is nothing he can do about it and then go groveling to the same people who put him away without any reason other than hatred and spite.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]