Author:
Dan Brewington (Still Childless)
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 22:21:24 06/15/14 Sun
Dear James,
I hope you enjoyed your Father's Day. Maybe you had the opportunity to spend it with your children. I on the other hand did not because you decided to error on the side of extreme caution in your orders, filed August 18, 2009, when you suspended/terminated ALL visitation I had with my 3 and 5 year old daughters until I underwent a psychological evaluation. Then you claimed ignorance of Appellate Rule 39 and claimed you did not have jurisdiction of my case while it was on appeal. (App Rule #39 states "An appeal does not stay the effect or enforceability of a judgment or order of a trial court or Administrative Agency unless the trial court, Administrative Agency or Court on Appeal otherwise orders." Then you continued to stay on my divorce case until June 14, 2010 despite later claiming my actions caused you to fear for the lives of your family in August 2009. Your delay in withdrawing made it impossible for me to get a hearing to have an evaluator approved until November 24, 2010. It was shortly after the new judge in my case appointed an evaluator that I was arrested for allegedly intimidating you. I spent 2.5 years behind bars because I was portrayed as a scary individual; mostly based on your "observations" and opinions of me, despite the fact you never held me in contempt or ever sought any protective orders against me like any other citizen would have to do. Throughout my trial, Prosecutor Negangard, who referred to you in the grand jury proceedings as "Jim" as if you were close friends, harshly criticized me for never seeking an evaluation to see my children. Even your lovely wife, former advisor to the Ethics and Professionalism Committee of the Indiana Supreme Court stated the following during my sentencing hearing, "He was given a simple request and instead he's turned that request, instead of seeking help, he's used this to intimidate my family and I, and to this day I am scared of him." Did you tell her you were the reason there was a delay in my attempts to be evaluated? Justice Rush cited your conclusions as a reason you should fear me but apparently your conclusions were incorrect. To place "context" on my alleged "hidden threats," Rush used Dr. Connor's findings and your decree to establish that my alleged "hidden threats" were true threats of physical harm. Well this Father's Day I wanted to give you something special. I'm aware that my flawless parenting record, history of non-violence, and Dr. Connor recommending liberal parenting time was not enough for you to trust I do not present a danger to anyone. That's why I am giving you a look at Dan Brewington's psychological evaluation for a Father's Day gift. I just wanted to put your mind at ease that I am going to continue to be a non-violent person just as I have for the first 40 years of my life and here's the psychological report to back it up. Any future writings of mine criticizing you for making my children fatherless for the past 5 years should not be confused with hidden threats of illegal conduct, as they are justifiably harsh criticisms for you going to such measures to punish a father for criticizing your court and the "professionals" you protect. Please take some comfort in now having evidence that I am not a danger to anyone. Please pass the word to Mrs. Humphrey there is no need to fear me because I justifiably criticized her husband for stripping my daughters of a father without any justifiable reason. Next time you talk to Prosecutor Negangard, you can inform him of the misunderstanding about my level of dangerousness as perceived by the paranoid unethical members of the Indiana Judicial System. You have a very Happy Father's Day.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 