Re: Corruption at Fort Polk -- Military Corruption

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:40:18 02/06/07 Tue
Author: Annie
Subject: Re: Corruption at Fort Polk
In reply to: MW64 's message, "Corruption at Fort Polk" on 10:28:12 10/01/06 Sun

A woman scorned....

>Complaint involving a Fort Polk Contractor
>DAKF11-02-C-0003-contract number
>
>1. Mr. Bob Shirron (AECOM Project Manager) (unmarried)
>is engaged in an
>inappropriate relationship with a former contract
>employee (Monica M King)
>(unmarried) associated with the contract. Ms. King is
>now a government
>employee (GS-10/3) in charge of the Allen Memorial
>Library on Fort Polk. Prior
>to Ms. King becoming a government employee, she was
>employed by Critique a
>subcontractor to AECOM on Fort Polk. While an employee
>of Critique, Mr.
>Shirron had to reprimand Ms. King due to misuse of the
>company credit card.
>Their relationship is inappropriate because of their
>positions on the
>installation.
>
>2. Mr. Shirron and Ms. King exchange proprietary
>information regarding the
>Library and AECOM�s position. Information regarding
>personnel, funding,
>contracts, contacts, and other supplemental
>information are being provided
>to Mr. Shirron by Ms. King. Mr. Shirron is using Ms.
>King�s position and
>the information she has provided as the Librarian to
>secure a larger part of
>the contract and to influence the award fees given to
>AECOM for the Library
>portion of the contract.
>
>3. As a retired US ARMY Colonel, Mr. Shirron has
>assisted in shielding Ms.
>King�s extensive prior and current criminal history
>from Civilian Personnel
>by providing her with details on how to circumvent the
>system. Ms. King�s
>security clearance is due to be adjudicated soon and
>Mr. Shirron has
>provided her with details on how secure her clearance
>even though he is
>aware of her charges of burglary, theft, and larceny
>as well as the number
>of restraining orders against her. Mr. Shirron is also
>aware of Ms. King lying on her official application
>for her current position. (Documentation provided upon
>request). Mr. Shirron routinely boasts about
>being �untouchable� and his friendships with people in
>high places on the
>installation and with AECOM's corporate office. He is
>a regular golfing
>partner to Ms. King�s direct supervisor (Mr. Don
>Davis).
>
>4. Mr. Shirron has paid many of Ms. King�s bills for
>her and continues to
>supplement her income with thousands of dollars in
>cash and checks deposited
>into her bank account. (Documents provided upon
>request)
>
>5. Mr. Shirron allows, the currently homeless and
>documented alcoholic, Ms.
>King to reside in his home and consume large amounts
>of alcohol even though
>she was arrested and charged in Rapides Parish, LA
>with driving while
>intoxicated in March 2006.
>
>6. Mr. Shirron and Ms. King spend several hours a
>month conversing with each
>other via government telephones and personal cell
>phones during work hours
>for the purpose of only discussing personal matters.
>This amounts to
>mismanagement of the contract by Mr. Shirron and a
>lack of effort by Ms.
>King in performing her duties at the Fort Polk
>Library. In an effort to
>continue shielding their relationship from AECOM
>employees as well as the
>federal government, Mr. Shirron has begun utilizing
>his Administrative
>Assistant's telephone during holidays and weekends to
>contact Ms. King. Mr.
>Shirron and Ms. King also utilize government and
>personal email accounts
>while supposedly on duty for the purpose of
>perpetuating their relationship.
>(Phone records provided upon request)
>
>7. Mr. Shirron has been investigated at other
>installations for this type of behavior even while on
>active duty.
>
>This 200 million dollar cost plus contract is due to
>be re-bid in the coming years and Mr. Shirron is
>being provided with confidential information about
>part of the contract.
>Will other potential bidders be privy to the
>information Ms. King provides
>to AECOM? How many other government employees does Mr.
>Shirron have on his
>personal payroll? Does the Department of Defense allow
>contractors to use
>their installations as their own private playground?
>The actions of Mr.
>Shirron and Ms. King represent unfair business
>practices in the spirit of
>true contract competition. I am sure AECOM's
>competitors would be up in
>arms over this information.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]