VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]2 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:32:40 06/10/08 Tue
Author: anyasbuttmonkey
Subject: I've already hashed my thoughts out with you via text...
In reply to: Esmerelda 's message, "Thoughts on The Hub" on 17:22:45 06/08/08 Sun

But suffice it to say I disagree with you on most things :)

There's cylon pilots in the raiders? Since when? That just seemed a random insertion to have fauxAthena speechify.

It's only ever been explicitly stated that the Cylon Raiders are biomechanical. The Heavy Raiders on the other hand, which is what were being used, are more like the Colonial Raptors, and it's never been said in the show that they fly themselves. Indeed, we saw in Valley Of Darkness that it was the Centurions occupying it (and, we assume, piloting it) - so it's not unbelievable that the Humlons would fly them too. Basically, my argument is that they were never definitively shown to be biomechanical, so there's leeway :)

FauxAthena. What was the point? Well, I get the point an eight looking to be an individual decides to mimic Athena casue she hasn't quite got the hang of this individuality thing yet. In itself it's not a bad idea, but they seemed to just, do nothing with it. Helo barely even blinked.

This probably comes down to your view of Tahmoh's acting and what was necessary - I personally thought Tahmoh did an excellent job of conveying his natural curiousity, his revulsion and his confusion all at the same time. And also, I don't think that's going to be the end of this. FauxThena will be back, and pissed.

I'm not commenting on the acting choices made by Lucy Lawless and James Callis, because a) I've never seen Xena, so I can't compare; and b) I'm not entirely sure how you can say that the Baltar you saw was Season 1 Baltar - maybe in the more light-hearted moments of the episode but he's a character that can go either way (comedy or drama) depending on the situation, and besides that with the emergence of the cult (and his "forgiveness") there is a little less of the angsty, guilt-ridden Baltar we had in seasons 2/3.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> I agree Tahmoh's acting was subtle -- Chani, 10:40:51 06/10/08 Tue [1]

He doesn't overact unlike so many others...


[ Edit | View ]





[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.