VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:16:19 08/29/07 Wed
Author: Rmartin
Subject: I agree with all you say
In reply to: Rmartin 's message, "Actually, no I don't" on 22:36:48 08/27/07 Mon

We have strayed, haven't we.

You make a good point with "reality" TV. But it also goes to my point that those in Hollywood chase the buck. This too shall pass. Tv seems to go in cycles; sorta like the fashion industry.

I could of said it better if I had said quality follows honesty. What I mean to say is, if a writer believes in the work, it shows. Too often, what we get are elements that are added simply for their shock value. Whether it's controversial or sugar-sweet popular, if it comes from the heart, viewers will respond. Then we will get 20 shows coping the idea.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.