[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:19:30 02/21/11 Mon
Author: niki
Subject: thoughts on Wisconsin?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[>
Can anyone help me? -- niki, 19:59:14 02/21/11 Mon [1]
This is from the Wisconsin bill, but no matter how many times I read it over, I cannot seem to get what it is saying....
"The bill would also authorize the Department of Employee Trust Funds to use $28 million of excess balances in reserve accounts for health insurance and pharmacy benefits to reduce health insurance premium costs."
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[>
Here's a couple of links that might help. -- Hogarth, 08:44:20 02/24/11 Thu [1]
http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/02/public-unions-force-taxpayers-fund-democrats
http://www.wkow.com/Global/story.asp?S=14014035
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
Re: Here's a couple of links that might help. -- niki, 10:51:21 02/24/11 Thu [1]
The second article has some bill details, but the wording is exactly the same as above.
"The bill would also authorize the Department of Employee Trust Funds to use $28 million of excess balances in reserve accounts for health insurance and pharmacy benefits to reduce health insurance premium costs."
I understand what is going on, I just do not think this sentence makes any sense. They are going to use funds that are in a trust for health insurance and pharmacy benefits for what? How do they plan to use it to "reduce premium costs?" It sounds to me like they are using money that was put in this trust form something else? Then what happens when that money IS needed for health insurance and pharmacy benefits?
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Maybe... -- Hogarth, 09:48:10 02/26/11 Sat [1]
it could mean they'd use the $28 million of excess balances in reserve accounts to set up HealthFund HRA (Health Reimbursement Arrangement) accounts for the union employees. My company did this when they changed our health ins deductible from $1,000 to $4,000. HealthFund HRA accounts were set up giving each employee $1,500 towards the $4,000 deductible. Then we were given the option of a Flexible Spending Account to cover the remaining $2,500.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: Maybe... -- niki, 07:55:16 03/01/11 Tue [1]
Most of the already have HSAs. I have heard that they are going to dip into the Employee Trust to pay for the states portion of the insurance contribution and I don't think that seems appropriate, but I cannot find any verifiable facts on the matter.
I just find it very annoying that everyone has an opinion of this bill and yet no one can even tell us what parts of it mean. Kind of scary if you ask me.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
