VOTE? Remove the rule around future pick trading? -- SuperLeague

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

14/06/26 6:15am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 29/09/21 11:45am
Author: Brendan
Subject: VOTE? Remove the rule around future pick trading?

I've not discussed this with anyone, however, I see a number of active coaches trading and it got me thinking...

By having this rule 'you must hold 1x 1st round or 2nd round pick in the upcoming or future ND at all times' are we just preventing more trades? Some coaches are close to hitting the blocker and it might actual work against the league and the activity in trade period.

We implemented the rule to ensure if a coach leaves, they don't leave a team with no picks for the new coach - however, in practice they would actually be giving a new coach a team with decent players, depth, or something at least of value?

What do we think on a vote here to have it scrapped? I know the likes of Shy, John, Tom would probably be able to entertain a few extra trades...

I'll start a vote n see where it goes haha no harm I guess.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

YES - remove (NT) -- Brendan, 29/09/21 11:46am
Yes - Remove (doesn't really bother me) (NT) -- John, 29/09/21 2:03pm
YES (NT) -- Sam H, 29/09/21 2:10pm
OK - Now I have lots of picks to trade, Anyone? (NT) -- '51Bewick, 29/09/21 2:21pm
- Add me to the straight away group (NT) -- '51Bewick, 29/09/21 8:22pm
Yes (NT) -- Sam, 29/09/21 3:33pm
Yes - but starting NEXT trade period. -- tenderWARRIOR, 29/09/21 4:19pm
Yes, I agree with AAron -- Maxwell, 29/09/21 4:23pm
Yes, and straight away -- Tom, 29/09/21 7:42pm
Haha 100% strike rate (so far) -- Brendan, 29/09/21 8:10pm
Yes - remove -- GTD, 29/09/21 11:02pm
- This vote is to get rid of that rule though 😅 -- tenderWARRIOR, 29/09/21 11:35pm
  - The rule is to protect a coach leaving a side in a heap -- GTD, 30/09/21 8:11am
    - isn't that why we had a rule about not being able to trade all future picks? -- tenderWARRIOR, 30/09/21 9:15am
      - Yeah fair call (NT) -- GTD, 30/09/21 9:42am
        Agree. New coach will always have the ability to come in and trade old boys…. -- Brendan, 1/10/21 10:30am
- Not sure that this is a good thing -- Maxwell, 30/09/21 10:06pm
  - Who would leave? -- Tom (Healey), 30/09/21 10:15pm
    - Spot, still at 100% agreeable to the removal of this rule…. -- Brendan, 1/10/21 10:32am
Ruling Removed - Effective Immediately… happy trading all!! (NT) -- Brendan (behalf of mods), 5/10/21 12:17am
- Kookaburras Picks -- '51Bewick, 5/10/21 8:30am
  - + Kookaburras 2022 2nd (NT) -- '51Bewick, 5/10/21 8:42am

Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.