VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

13/06/26 5:07pm [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 27/07/21 2:17pm
Author: D9
Subject: It's a question because it contradicts the reasons they were bought in
In reply to: Brendan 's message, "Watched the carlton game..." on 26/07/21 10:29am

In other discussions, you have said that coaches wanted these rules put in, so top teams didn't just put gun midfielders in pockets and flanks. So how is that going? How many Top sides are trying to do this.

It seems this rule is just inconveniencing sides that are down on their luck. Injured or have players that are not being selected.

Seems to me, that a number of coaches through discussions about the balance rules, believe them to be too restrictive, and should be relaxed. As I keep saying, the rules were bought in with a promise to be flexible.

Since then, the tightening has occurred automatically.

REGARDLESS! It is up to Mods, to understand how this game works. When a coach is bringing up his grievances about the game we play, Mods should be empathetic to the situation, and explain that without a ruling by vote saying otherwise, the mods are there to run the game as the current rules permit.

We are all just worth one vote, and when ANY issue goes to vote, it is to be clear and concise to not confuse the voter, it is to be final once the vote is cast.

What I got is just arguing back about the premise of the rule. We understand you have opinions on it, but regardless, a vote should be called, and change be made if required.

It is all really that simple. A vote was also carried that we still be able to vote on things DURING the season. Once that was made clear, a question could have went up by mods, as to whether people think the balance rules should be voted on, as coaches were generally saying that they are too restrictive.

Would a vote on this topic, and the easing of penalty's be that disruptive to the game during the seaon? I think not! But you would rather have coaches in annoyance at it all for a long period of time.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.