Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, December 22, 07:23:15am

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Michael Moore Author: Wade A. Tisthammer [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 09/26/04 10:14pm In reply to: Biff 's message, "...and speaking of Farenheit 9-11" on 09/17/04 9:17pm >I spent real money to go see something that I expected >to be of the calibre of "Bowling for Columbine." I got >a two-and-a-half hour campaign ad. I was at first >intrigued, then insulted, then bored. Finally I >decided it was ridiculous to the point of laughable. > >That's my review of the week. I doubt Bowling for Columbine was much better. At first I was sympathetic (I'm very pro-gun control) and liked the documentary. But I later found out it was pretty misleading. Case in point, remember Charlton Heston and the NRA going in after the the Columbine shootings? Moore said, “Just ten days after the Columbine killings, despite the pleas of a community in mourning, Charlton Heston came to Denver and held a large pro-gun rally for the National Rifle Association.” Here I'm thinking, Charlton Heston, that bastard. But what he leaves out is that the NRA planned the meeting years in advance, and that they cancelled every event they could legally cancel (several days of luncheons, exhibits etc.). The only event they didn't cancel was the annual meeting, which the law required be held. The meeting could be legally rescheduled--if at least 10 days notice in advance is given to the members. Of course, this couldn’t be feasibly done. So the NRA was stuck with not much choice but to hold the annual meeting days after the Columbine shooting. But Moore leaves this fact out and terribly misleads the viewer with words like “Just ten days after the Columbine killings—despite pleas of a community in mourning…” This is not an isolated incident. Things like these happened frequently throughout the documentary. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]