Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>How different things were in the UK. (It is clear from >>the language and terminology that Sean is writing >>about the USA). >>Here, panty girdles were almost unknown in the 1950s >>and most of the 60s and certainly not worn routinely >>by younger girls. Panty girdles arrived en masse only >>when tights began to replace stockings - and even then >>they were mostly brief panties, not long-leg ones. >>No part of an open girdle would normally be seen so >>there was no such "exccitement" for teenage boys here. >> We might manage to find out by appearance or even >>feel whether a girdle (probably just a light roll-on) >>or a suspender belt was being worn. On the other >>hand, suspenders were not hidden inside girdle legs >>(as Sean describes) and their outline was therefore >>more likely to be seen - and, to those of us with en >>eye for such details, might answer the girdle or belt >>question. > >Yes I've heard that long leg girdles were much more >popular here in the USA. I don't really understand >why. Fashions were very similar otherwise as far as I >know. Mini skirts and bell bottoms. I'm sure my wife >never wore an open bottom girdle. But she would never >wear a skirt or dress without a long leg panty girdle >on. She was in junior and high school in the '60s.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.