Subject:  Re: *Important* Concerning guild issues.... |
Author:
Eurek
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 07:04:40 04/13/01 Fri
In reply to:
Rainik
's message, "Re: *Important* Concerning guild issues...." on 11:12:55 04/12/01 Thu
If you guys feel this is being blown out of proportion, it's not. I do apologize in advance if this is insulting, but this is what message boards are for, to air it out, so all may come to an understanding of how you feel.
I have a much better idea of why there seems to be seperate "personalities" on our guild leader.I was unsure how to read a simple request I made of Kydan the other night. I asked for a port, and stated in guild chat, if none could, it would be ok, but say sumthin! Overall, not a big deal, as i know sometimes in the heat of combat you miss a few comments here and there. No response. I saw Kydan in what i believe was either the commons, or karanas, and so i sent him a tell, since he said nuthin.
/tell Kydan anybody Home? hehe :0)...../reply No. Dry huh? Just like that, not a ...im kinda busy, or...gimme a minute, or...any number of different responses. This made me think on a lot of different things...
I hadn't really read all the posts til now, but it does explain quite a bit. At no point had i ever witnessed our leader attempt to participate, nor encourage ANY guild Coehesion. In the beginning, I assumed it was because he was quite a bit older than us, so it would make it hard at best. that is no longer the case. We have quite a few 45 plus members, but yet, still no clear cut..design, nor direction. I'll save the long story. I'm oughta here. I will not, and can not be a part of a guild that has no clear cut path, or leader for that matter. Sharing a character, sure. Having a real life friend/relative/whatever level your character, cool. In a guild, as a leader? Not.
Nuff' said...Good luck Legion, and Thank you to all those who bent over backwards to help a simple barbarian become a better warrior, and overall better person.
Eurek---
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 
