Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: It's "Opprobrium" Steve! -- Steve, 12/ 1/15 10:26:49am Tue
>>But, you're right on, nonetheless!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>There is nothing to "be argued" and it's not up to
>>>others to supply funding information for the Belfast
>>>tournament or the new arena for that manner. Just
>look
>>>it all up yourself.
>>>
>>>And before you go about insulting Colgate teams and
>>>social workers with your invective think about taking
>>>a deep breath, vent and ponder the likely
>>>consequences. A little effort and balance on your
>part
>>>can go a long way in avoiding approbrium.
>>>
>>>Like I said yesterday, stop digging and move on
>>>already. OK?
>>>
>>>Go 'gate!
>
>Invective? Approbrium? My apologies for being a
>social worker who used taxpayer bucks to attend a
>state school rather than a social worker who attended
>an overpriced private college, but "invective" and
>"approbrium" in a single rant? I'm humbled and
>humiliated. By the way, why can't I find the latter of
>those two words in the dictionary?
There is no need to apologize for your background!
The earlier poster is correct in that I mistyped and thereby misspelled opprobrium. I may have been thinking of "Approval" which one might reasonably expect to earn when contributing on this site- something others might approve of, agree with and appreciate. No, not a rant, just a viewpoint or maybe a suggestion.
Anyway, now that you are using the words invective and opprobrium you have more arrows in your quiver. Nothing wrong with that, is there?
Go 'gate!
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
USCHO article on Belfast's Varied Beneficiaries -- Raider Archivist, 12/ 3/15 11:51:04pm Thu
A good read: http://www.uscho.com/2015/12/03/umass-lowell-gets-the-hardware-at-the-friendship-four-but-the-real-victor-is-college-hockey/
>>>But, you're right on, nonetheless!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>There is nothing to "be argued" and it's not up to
>>>>others to supply funding information for the Belfast
>>>>tournament or the new arena for that manner. Just
>>look
>>>>it all up yourself.
>>>>
>>>>And before you go about insulting Colgate teams and
>>>>social workers with your invective think about
>taking
>>>>a deep breath, vent and ponder the likely
>>>>consequences. A little effort and balance on your
>>part
>>>>can go a long way in avoiding approbrium.
>>>>
>>>>Like I said yesterday, stop digging and move on
>>>>already. OK?
>>>>
>>>>Go 'gate!
>>
>>Invective? Approbrium? My apologies for being a
>>social worker who used taxpayer bucks to attend a
>>state school rather than a social worker who attended
>>an overpriced private college, but "invective" and
>>"approbrium" in a single rant? I'm humbled and
>>humiliated. By the way, why can't I find the latter of
>>those two words in the dictionary?
>
>
>There is no need to apologize for your background!
>
>The earlier poster is correct in that I mistyped and
>thereby misspelled opprobrium. I may have been
>thinking of "Approval" which one might reasonably
>expect to earn when contributing on this site-
>something others might approve of, agree with and
>appreciate. No, not a rant, just a viewpoint or maybe
>a suggestion.
>
>Anyway, now that you are using the words invective and
>opprobrium you have more arrows in your quiver.
>Nothing wrong with that, is there?
>
>Go 'gate!
Forum timezone: GMT-5 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |