Pulsar undercarriage geometry (Tailwheel) -- Welcome to the (UK) Pulsar Aircraft Owners forum.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject: Pulsar undercarriage geometry (Tailwheel)

Author:
Bob P

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, Nov 25 2012, 22:36:58 GMT
In reply to: Alan Gill 's message, "Pulsar u/c strenght" on Tue, Nov 13 2012, 10:13:12 GMT

I had a paddle through my old emails and found that it was Roger Bishop who fitted a Grove Undercarriage with the main wheels set slightly forward. I emailed Roger on the subject and he advised me as follows:

Hi Bob. Yes I did change the position slightly. I dont have a spec but When I changed the U/C I made a jig of the old position then when I fitted the Grove I shifted the axle position 1.5" forward. The grove was also 1.5" taller further improving the geometry. Hope that helps. Roger

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Pulsar U/C geometry (tailwheel)	Alan Gill	Mon, Nov 26 2012, 16:33:05 GMT