VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:13:48 04/05/02 Fri
Author: Dave Brown
Subject: Re: Here's some facts!
In reply to: Chazman 's message, "Here's some facts!" on 11:38:12 04/05/02 Fri

>>Basic thievery? You are joking right? People who have
>>bought the LOBG have improved an average of 25%. How
>>is that thievery? What other video package has
>>produced such results? Any? While they do have more
>>advanced material, the LOBG as proven to help people
>>play better golf. Isn't that what people are looking
>>for in buying the package in the first place?
>
>Excuse me, but selling one swing with the LTOBG
>package, and then selling a radically different one
>through another set of tapes is most certainly
>dishonest, especially when the stooges on this and
>other NG boards now tout the old swing as inferior and
>a blocking move!
>As for

Radically different? All fundamentals are the same! LOBG works! 25% improvemnt. I don't see anything wrong with that.

>
>>the irons, I don't know anybody who has ever bought
>>anything because of a patent number. The patent number
>>protects the company (supoposedly) from copycats.
>
>Absolute B.S.! NG touts that their swing is patented,
>and so are their clubs, they are falsely advertising
>that the P3s are so great that they are patented, when
>indeed the patent on the side of the hosel is for Jack
>Kuykendal's old Gen1 clubs! How could the P3s be
>proteced from copy cats, when the patent doesn't mathc
>their specs?

If the patent is not good then you are free to build and sell your own P3s. The patent protects the company. I have never bought one thing in my life based on it having a patent or not.

>
>>
>>>
>>>Chaz's frustrations with NG are based on fact and
>true
>>>life experiences, and I want to hear both sides of
>any
>>>story.
>>
>>
>>Who's fact? He makes up BS. and lies, and attacks
>>anybody who is supportive of NG. Calling them names
>>like he is a little child. Just watch his response to
>>these posts. The name of this forum is the Natural
>>Golfers' Support forum. I don't see him supporting
>>Natural Golfers. Do you?
>
>I greatly support the Natural Golf method, as it was
>originally taught by Kuykendal and is still being
>taught by Tom Sanders. This new junk they are teaching
>isn't Single Axis Golf, it's CG with a palm grip!

You obviously have not tried it. The fundamentals are exactly the same as they have always been. In CG you do not face the ball at impact, in NG you do.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.