VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:17:42 02/27/03 Thu
Author: JoeStag
Subject: Re: Question
In reply to: JCM 's message, "Question" on 14:08:28 02/27/03 Thu

JCM, I cannot disagree with you, the Stags COULD be better with less substitution...... but I also cannot agree with you either, we COULD also be worse off.

If we had a stud starting lineup with 2-3-4 All MAAC players, I would agree with you 100%..... play them all 30+ minutes, but we have a bunch of young players that are trying to find their offensive games, along with some experience players that have limitations to their offense, but have great intensity and leadership.

I think if you look back in history you will see that TOT has always played his All MAAC players 30+ min per game.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.