VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678 ]
Subject: Re: ELECTION 2004


Author:
fate_777
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03:25:13 03/11/04 Thu
In reply to: James 's message, "ELECTION 2004" on 15:44:01 03/10/04 Wed

>>The race in Florida was VERY close last time. However
>after FOUR recounts the Sec. of State of Florida Ms
>Harris followed the law to the T and certified the
>election and Bush was pronounced the winner. The
>Democrats sued saying that this was somehow illegal
>and it was "disenfranchising" the people. It went to
>the Florida Supream Court and they ruled saying that
>"every vote must count." Then the state of florida
>appealed to the United States Supream Court and the
>decision was retuned back to the Florida Supream court
>(in a 9-0 decision) saying that they need to re-think
>their ruling. The Florida court ruled again that the
>recounts must continue and once again the State of
>Florida appealed. This time in a 5-4 vote the Supream
>court ruled in favor of the state of Florida saying
>that "the law is clear in Florida. The Votes must be
>certified after so many days. Therefore Florida's
>certification of the votes was accepted." Bush won the
>election despite the cries of injustice by democrats.
>
>Let me let you in on a FACT again. All the trouble in
>florida was started BY democrats. You see all those
>voting districts where people were "disenfranchised"
>were run BY DEMOCRATS. Those Democrats came up with
>those horrid hanging chad ballots. Those democrats
>then blamed republicans for stealing the election when
>the voters could not figure out how to use them.
>
>The Supream Court did not elect a president they
>simply undid the wrong that the Florida Supream Court
>commited by forcing the recounts. End of Story.


from what I saw the democrats only wanted to recount votes in the heavy democratic counties instead of a state wide recount. is that right?


>
>WMD in Iraq: Bush and all of us in the military acted
>upon what we thought was good intelligence. Turned out
>it was faulty. I know this because I WORK in Intel.


if the CIA knew something Bush was putting in a speech was wrong they should have told Bush's adminstration instead of ignoring it. We are only as good as our intelligence so blame falls on CIA not on Bush.

and with the claim of Iraq buying uranium being false we never said our own intelligence said that, we said that
MI-5 made that claim and passed it on to us

>

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: ELECTION 2004Bryan Reed20:49:21 03/11/04 Thu
Re: ELECTION 2004James08:03:14 03/21/04 Sun


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.