VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:52:18 11/26/99 Fri
Author: Christy
Subject: Re: The source of a complaint
In reply to: Mr.Babel 's message, "The source of a complaint" on 19:49:25 11/26/99 Fri

> http://www-csag.cs.uiuc.edu/individual/pakin/complaint
>
> An interestng web spage. You enter a persons name,
> and how many paragraph you want a complaint to be, and
> it generates a random complaint, complete with vague
> ramblings.
>
> I see that these complaints are very much like
> horascopes. Where as I posted a couple of them, and
> they seem to hit nerves where none were thought to
> exist.
>
> Sorry if this experiment hurt, lets learn from it.
>
> In Love
> Christy (Satan again today)



My complaint about St. Stephen

This letter has three main sections. In the first, I argue that St. Stephen is the root of all evil. In the second, I make it clear that St. Stephen couldn't sell
otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idee fixe that he has been robbed of all he does not possess if his life depended on it, which it doesn't. And in the
third and final section, I conclude that the only visible result of his agendas has been a series of tactical and strategic policy blunders. For practical reasons, I
have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say.

Because "anarchoindividualist" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must make it clear that his cronies are hardly strangers to corporatism. As
one commentator put it, I'm oversimplifying things a little here. Should you think I'm saying too much, please note that St. Stephen's lackeys realize that if
their aims were sufficiently revealed, an informed public would have the power to upset their well-laid plans. Look, St. Stephen should stop caterwauling about
what he doesn't understand. By the end of the decade, he will turn his back on those who need him the most.

It is a dangerous folly to ignore the threat to democracy posed by the worst sorts of hopeless evil-doers there are. The reason is simple: If Fate desired that St.
Stephen make a correct application of what he had read about Maoism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the bloody-minded fool would
otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, St. Stephen is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient.
But when it threatens his creature comforts, St. Stephen throws principle to the wind. If you've ever watched television or read a book, odds are that you
already know that he is so prudish, I could lose heart.

When you reflect upon this, you'll realize that I, not being one of the many ultra-salacious Luddites of this world, am tired of hearing or reading that
expansionism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. You know that that is simply not true. St. Stephen's rejoinders are popular
among invidious carpetbaggers, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. As we organize our campaigns against unctuous pestiferous
Neanderthals and formulate responses to their rhetoric, it is critical that we draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word "anthropogeographical".

I attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that it makes perfect sense that St. Stephen doesn't want me to fight to the end
for our ideas and ideals. Be careful not to be charmed by his ventures. All they do is help tendentious fugitives evade capture by the authorities. He should
practice what he preaches.

It has been proven time and time again that I proudly adopt this stand. However, St. Stephen should just quit whining about everything. What so many people
find difficult to grasp is that there are some simple truths in this world. First, we must not miss our chance to resolve a number of lingering problems. Second,
he is every bit as tyrannical as sexist rascals. And finally, if his henchmen had even an ounce of integrity, they would take stock of what we know, identify
areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on St. Stephen's impertinent catch-phrases. How dare St. Stephen criticize my values
when his are so obviously conniving? He controls a secret underground empire. Okay, that's a slight exaggeration, but you get the general drift.

In point of fact, his true colors have finally come out. Insurrectionism is a weapon of racialism. Let me mention again that a central fault line runs through
each of St. Stephen's politics. Specifically, all of St. Stephen's words are paralogistic. St. Stephen says that disingenuous thugs are all inherently good,
sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. The inference is that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. I'm happy to report that I can't
follow that logic. For all of the foregoing reasons, I can confidently claim that he is the great master of deception.

He may find it inconceivable that there is no reason to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations and there is every reason not to, but he'll come to his
senses eventually. St. Stephen's goals oscillate between insane sadism and putrid Stalinism. Many experts now believe that there are nugatory pettifoggers in
our midst. I'll repeat what I've already said: There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about St. Stephen's recommendations. The difficult part is
in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by jaded jokers
because they see no other options for change. To make a long story short, St. Stephen and I disagree about our civic duties. I feel that we must do our utmost
to study the problem and recommend corrective action as expeditiously as possible. St. Stephen, on the other hand, believes that he is a martyr for freedom
and a victim of isolationism.

Although he babbles on and on about nihilism, St. Stephen has no more conception of it than most other sex-crazed vagrants. He is not only materialistic, but
he also lacks the self-control necessary to conform his behavior to reasonable norms. It's fine to realize that the St. Stephen-ization of our political and
spiritual lives will encourage stubborn clumsy serpents to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort when you least
expect it, but it's more important to know that different people often see the same subject in different lights. The whole premise of his writings is false, and his
arguments are specious at best. Juxtaposed to this is the idea that we are indeed living in mendacious times. Of course, it's not that simple.

While the most repugnant ogres you'll ever see claim to defend traditional values, they actually stretch credulity beyond the breaking point. In the past, when I
complained that St. Stephen was attempting to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole, I was told that I was just being
hectoring. But nowadays, people realize that he has really pulled a fast one this time. Once it becomes clear that the passage of time will make it clear to even
the more slow among us that it's not a question of if but only of when he will set the wolf to mind the sheep, it becomes apparent that his assumptions are
matched in their untenability only by the arrogant fervor with which they are held. That's all I have time now to write. If you want to get more insight into St.
Stephen's mentality, though, then study the details of his practices. Try to see the big picture: It will decisively amaze you. It will take your breath away. And it
will convince you that every morning St. Stephen asks himself, "How can I fool the masses today?".

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.