[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:35:03 01/20/03 Mon
Author: Already Done
Subject: Re: Losers
In reply to:
Tom DiStasio
's message, "2004 GTO" on 13:26:08 08/20/02 Tue
Look Einstein,
The only one whining and bitching is you. It is a GTO Web-Site that encourages comments on the 2004 GTO. If it bothers you so much to read the negative comments on the 2004 GTO then I would suggest that you quit logging on to the GTO Web-Sites and reading the comments. It does not bother me to read positive comments regarding the 2004 GTO. There are some posted from Australia and I am sure it is a fine car, but it is a poor choice to be a GTO and will not be able to compete with its competition
Unfortunately, you are probably right and the Monaro is coming and probably will not change, but that does not mean that consumers have to like it, lose their right to comment on it, or buy it.
Pontiac would have been smarter to keep the name Monaro on the current car and waited to develop a GTO. I believe that those that have stated their disappointment in the looks and horsepower of the 2004 GTO have done so in an intelligent way and have clearly articulated the reasons for it. Unlike you, who just seems to wants to snivel and try to slam people for their opposing opinions. You need to get a life and not let the fact that a large number of Pontiac fans are disappointed in Pontiac’s decision regarding the 2004 GTO. Hate to break it to you, but there are several other 2004 GTO Web-Sites out there and I would recommend that you not read those comments either.
Not only do I believe that half of us will not buy a 2004 GTO, but I also believe that the 2004 GTO will flop. Time will tell, and despite your dislike for ford, it is my bet that the 2004 Mustang is going to walk away with what could have been a lot of GTO sells. I am all for bashing Rice Burners, but I would not under estimate Ford or Mopar.
By the way, wrong again! I have purchased a new a car in 1997, 2000 and 2002 and have never owned a Camry or Honda. I own two out of the GM Stable, a Pontiac Grand Am, Chevy Truck and the other is a Jeep Wrangler Sahara.
I guess by your standards the fact that I own a Jeep means I lose my right to complain about the 2004 Pontiac GTO. Oh Well, Too Bad! The 2004 GTO is still under powered and looks to common to be a GTO!
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [>
Re: Losers -- neal, 10:46:32 01/21/03 Tue
>Look Einstein,
>
>The only one whining and bitching is you. It is a GTO
>Web-Site that encourages comments on the 2004 GTO. If
>it bothers you so much to read the negative comments
>on the 2004 GTO then I would suggest that you quit
>logging on to the GTO Web-Sites and reading the
>comments. It does not bother me to read positive
>comments regarding the 2004 GTO. There are some
>posted from Australia and I am sure it is a fine car,
>but it is a poor choice to be a GTO and will not be
>able to compete with its competition
>
>Unfortunately, you are probably right and the Monaro
>is coming and probably will not change, but that does
>not mean that consumers have to like it, lose their
>right to comment on it, or buy it.
>
>Pontiac would have been smarter to keep the name
>Monaro on the current car and waited to develop a GTO.
> I believe that those that have stated their
>disappointment in the looks and horsepower of the 2004
>GTO have done so in an intelligent way and have
>clearly articulated the reasons for it. Unlike you,
>who just seems to wants to snivel and try to slam
>people for their opposing opinions. You need to get a
>life and not let the fact that a large number of
>Pontiac fans are disappointed in Pontiac’s decision
>regarding the 2004 GTO. Hate to break it to you, but
>there are several other 2004 GTO Web-Sites out there
>and I would recommend that you not read those comments
>either.
>
>Not only do I believe that half of us will not buy a
>2004 GTO, but I also believe that the 2004 GTO will
>flop. Time will tell, and despite your dislike for
>ford, it is my bet that the 2004 Mustang is going to
>walk away with what could have been a lot of GTO
>sells. I am all for bashing Rice Burners, but I would
>not under estimate Ford or Mopar.
>
>
>By the way, wrong again! I have purchased a new a car
>in 1997, 2000 and 2002 and have never owned a Camry or
>Honda. I own two out of the GM Stable, a Pontiac
>Grand Am, Chevy Truck and the other is a Jeep Wrangler
>Sahara.
>
>I guess by your standards the fact that I own a Jeep
>means I lose my right to complain about the 2004
>Pontiac GTO. Oh Well, Too Bad! The 2004 GTO is still
>under powered and looks to common to be a GTO!
hmmm. shut up! you obviously have no life, just remember this song to help you out! Snap, Crackle, Pop, get a life loser!!!!!
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Losers/neal -- Bob, 18:34:47 01/21/03 Tue
>>Look Einstein,
>>
>>The only one whining and bitching is you. It is a GTO
>>Web-Site that encourages comments on the 2004 GTO. If
>>it bothers you so much to read the negative comments
>>on the 2004 GTO then I would suggest that you quit
>>logging on to the GTO Web-Sites and reading the
>>comments. It does not bother me to read positive
>>comments regarding the 2004 GTO. There are some
>>posted from Australia and I am sure it is a fine car,
>>but it is a poor choice to be a GTO and will not be
>>able to compete with its competition
>>
>>Unfortunately, you are probably right and the Monaro
>>is coming and probably will not change, but that does
>>not mean that consumers have to like it, lose their
>>right to comment on it, or buy it.
>>
>>Pontiac would have been smarter to keep the name
>>Monaro on the current car and waited to develop a GTO.
>> I believe that those that have stated their
>>disappointment in the looks and horsepower of the 2004
>>GTO have done so in an intelligent way and have
>>clearly articulated the reasons for it. Unlike you,
>>who just seems to wants to snivel and try to slam
>>people for their opposing opinions. You need to get a
>>life and not let the fact that a large number of
>>Pontiac fans are disappointed in Pontiac’s decision
>>regarding the 2004 GTO. Hate to break it to you, but
>>there are several other 2004 GTO Web-Sites out there
>>and I would recommend that you not read those comments
>>either.
>>
>>Not only do I believe that half of us will not buy a
>>2004 GTO, but I also believe that the 2004 GTO will
>>flop. Time will tell, and despite your dislike for
>>ford, it is my bet that the 2004 Mustang is going to
>>walk away with what could have been a lot of GTO
>>sells. I am all for bashing Rice Burners, but I would
>>not under estimate Ford or Mopar.
>>
>>
>>By the way, wrong again! I have purchased a new a car
>>in 1997, 2000 and 2002 and have never owned a Camry or
>>Honda. I own two out of the GM Stable, a Pontiac
>>Grand Am, Chevy Truck and the other is a Jeep Wrangler
>>Sahara.
>>
>>I guess by your standards the fact that I own a Jeep
>>means I lose my right to complain about the 2004
>>Pontiac GTO. Oh Well, Too Bad! The 2004 GTO is still
>>under powered and looks to common to be a GTO!
hmmm. shut up! you obviously have no life, just
>remember this song to help you out! Snap, Crackle,
>Pop, get a life loser!!!!!
Oh come on Neal at crocotor@hotmail, is that the best that you can do? What do you want me to say? sticks and stone will break my bones? A little childish don’t you think? What’s the problem? Can not write, spell or put a sentence together. Open a book some time it may help!
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [>
Re: Losers -- I may be Einstein, 09:56:19 01/22/03 Wed
Einstein is it?
Well look here Bubba Ray...you are one of those white trash redneck idiots that gives the US muscle car fraternity a bad name. Do you understand the concept of styling? I bet your one of those people that thinks Cladding = cool.
Me big Pontiac fan, me like big scoop...So you would like GM to Grab a Boeing 747 Turbine as a hood scoop, grab the roof off the Louisiana Superdome as a rear wing and oh while they are at it...put in one of those fancy fake chain steering wheels.
Most of us Americans wont give the GTO a chance because it wasnt designed here, but when it succeeds we will claim it as our own and say it was basically US designed.
Got Cladding.........?
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
getting a little personal aren't we -- Matthew Burns, 00:23:27 01/23/03 Thu
look guys, don't get personal. it aint worth it... this is an internet message board, and you guys are getting pissed at people that you don't ever really know.
take a look around and see just how trivial this all really is.
and as fas as resulting toattacking ones intelect is downright immature, as is getting pissed about something like this.
christ guys, take a breather get layed or something, just relax....
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
