Re: new world church secretary -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:24:42 11/14/12 Wed
Author: George
Subject: Re: new world church secretary
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: new world church secretary" on 11:56:32 11/14/12 Wed

>>>>>but then again, your assertions are just that.
>your
>>>>>assertions.
>>>>>
>>>>>john
>>>>
>>>>John, her assertions are only her assertions because
>>>>there is not the least concept of truth in the
>>>>Community of Christ. In the Community of Christ, the
>>>>"truth" is whatever the people who matter believe is
>>>>necessary to execute their agenda. Also, those who
>do
>>>>not believe what is necessary to execute this agenda
>>>>by definition do not matter.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>>
>>>What I should do is, whenever I post the url for
>>>something the c-not-of-c said or did, I should put
>>>under it, "true?" or "false?"
>>>
>>> >>>href="http://www.cofchrist.org/OnlineResources/issues
>/
>>1
>>>982homosexuality.asp">http://www.cofchrist.org/Online
>R
>>e
>>>sources/issues/1982homosexuality.asp
>>>
>>>In the critical matter of ordination, the church
>>>should not admit a practicing homosexual to the
>>>priesthood. It cannot sanction homosexual acts as
>>>morally acceptable behavior any more than it can
>>>endorse heterosexual promiscuity. If a member of
>>>the priesthood admits to, or is found to be engaged
>in
>>>homosexual behavior, the administrative officer
>having
>>>jurisdiction should institute procedures for
>silencing
>>>according to church law.
>>>
>>>This was the stand in 1982. True? False?
>>>
>>> >>>href="http://www.cofchrist.org/usaconf/FAQ.asp">http:
>/
>>/
>>>www.cofchrist.org/usaconf/FAQ.asp
>>>
>>>USA National Conference
>>>Frequently Asked Questions
>>>
>>>4. Why are we talking about same-gender marriages and
>>>ordaining people in same-gender relationships?
>Doesn�t
>>>the church already have a policy about ordaining
>>>homosexuals?
>>>
>>>a. In 1982, the Standing High Council wrote a
>>>document. From that document, the First Presidency
>>>created a policy that does not allow ordination of
>>>anyone (heterosexual or homosexual) involved in
>sexual
>>>relationships outside of marriage.
>>>
>>>The wording is different, the second one changing the
>>>meaning of the first one. True? False?
>>>
>>>That makes the c-not-of-c leadership a pack of liars.
>>>True? False?
>>>
>>>Lois
>>True
>>False
>>False
>>
>>if you read the SHC statement, it is clear that it is
>>about extramarital sexual relations. That is the
>>clear context. It further lays the basis for that in
>>the fact that homosexuals, in 1982 (and still in many
>>places today),could not legally marry.
>>The context of the policy in 1982, as it still is,
>>relates to sexual promiscuity...not whether it is
>>heterosexual or homosexual, per se.
>
>matt,
>
>true, true, true
>
>I see you are up to your old legal schmlegal game
>again. Namely, that now that in some states same
>gender marriages are legal that it is not fornication
>anymore. The 1982 statement was against practicing
>homosexuality. I mentioned the book, 1984, not long
>ago. The community of anti-christ is fond of rewriting
>history.
>
>Lois

Lois, what has happened in the Community of Christ is that it has become so secular that it looks to secular law for guidance in what used to be spiritual matters. As Jesus said of the apostate Jews, "Ye have made the Law of none effect by your traditions." And in the case of Christians, the salvation of Jesus Christ has been made null and void by their traditions as well. It's just ironic that a Restoration cult has done it, too.

I just fail to see why apostates act so anxious to court approval.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: new world church secretary -- -, 08:23:37 11/15/12 Thu
- Re: new world church secretary -- George, 20:24:48 11/15/12 Thu