VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]456789 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:02:59 03/18/12 Sun
Author: Lazlo
Author Host/IP: adsl-99-136-255-103.dsl.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net / 99.136.255.103
Subject: "Mr. Tiny Todger, please forgive me"

2 articles from the New York Post. The first one appeared in today's paper.

Prickly Mick: No Stones!

These creaky Stones won’t roll.

Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger is still seething that Keith Richards dared to insult his manhood, claiming in Keith’s 2011 tell-all autobiography, “Life,” that his longtime lady-loving bandmate has a “tiny todger.”

The barb, dubbed “Willygate” by the British press, has apparently torpedoed what was left of the aging rock duo’s already icy relationship and sank any chance for a Stones 50th anniversary reunion tour this year.

“Mick feels that Keith violated their friendship completely, damaged his reputation and that of the Rolling Stones,” a Stones source tells London’s Daily Mail.

Richards claims he discovered the tidbit about his old friend’s bits and pieces during a tryst he had in 1960 with Marianne Faithfull, then Jagger’s girlfriend.

Making matters worse, he added how it had been his good fortune to bury his head in Faithfull’s “beautiful jugs” during an afternoon sex romp.

Last week, Richards, 68, apologized — in an effort to patch things up with Jagger, also a spry 68.

“As far as the book goes, it was my story and it was very raw, as I meant it to be,” Richards said. “But I know that some parts of it, and some of the publicity, really offended Mick, and I regret that.”



http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/prickly_mick_no_stones_9mMJUWAI1xDRopoJGNg6GP?utm_medium=rss&utm_content=International



From yesterday:



Keith Richards 'regrets' saying Mick Jagger had a tiny todger.


Keith Richards says that "regrets" lobbing insults at his Rolling Stones bandmate Mick Jagger in his best-selling book, "Life." In the tome, Richards had revealed that his nickname for Jagger was "Her Majesty" and had alleged that the frontman had a "tiny todger."

"[Mick] and I have had conversations over the last year of a kind we have not had for an extremely long time and that has been incredibly important to me," Richards says in a documentary about the band's 50th anniversary, to be released in September. "As far as the book goes, it was my story and it was very raw, as I meant it to be, but I know that some parts of it and some of the publicity really offended Mick and I regret that."

Jagger was most likely offended that Richards had taken a jab at the size of his genitalia in a section where Richards' described his longtime girlfriend, Anita Pallenberg, as tiring of carrying on an affair with Jagger.

"The idea of status quo to Anita, in those days, was verboten. Everything must change. And we're not married, we're free, whatever. You're free as long as you let me know what's going on," wrote Richards. "Anyway, she had no fun with his tiny todger. I know he's got an enormous pair of balls, but it doesn't quite fill the gap, does it?"

Another oft-quoted section of "Life" read, "It was the beginning of the Eighties when Mick started to become unbearable. That's when be became Brenda, or Her Majesty, or just Madam."

In the documentary, Jagger admits that there was significant friction between himself and Richards and also expressed that he was glad the book had given the two occasion to discuss their differences.

"Looking back at any career you are bound to recall both the highs and the lows," said Jagger. "In the 1980s for instance Keith and I were not communicating very well. I got very involved with the business side of the Stones, mainly because I felt no one else was interested, but it’s plain now from the book that Keith felt excluded, which is a pity."

Jagger concluded, "Time, I reckon, to move on."


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/keith_richards_regrets_saying_mick_gkuSxYRBDKthDShIXisgFM#ixzz1pULjO700

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.