VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:39:22 10/25/02 Fri
Author: Snarl
Subject: Re: Case Study: Monash University shooting
In reply to: Goktimus Prime 's message, "Case Study: Monash University shooting" on 17:00:17 10/25/02 Fri

I couldnt agree more with the above statement. However to use martial arts on an armed opponent one must first get into close range, another prospect entirely! I believe ninjutsu has developed several techniques for effectivly closing in on heavily armed opponet, such as rolls and the the like.

Also, another point is that there is no true unarmed defence against an armed opponent (save for running!), there is only offence! You have to take the fight to the attacker rather than just hanging back, blocking and counterattacking.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.