Re: typical, you should all read this.. -- Council of The Grey

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:16:54 08/30/00 Wed
Author: Robin
Subject: Re: typical, you should all read this..
In reply to: avalanche 's message, "typical, you should all read this.." on 11:25:55 08/30/00 Wed

> whilst all i did was argue with good clear arguments
> on james's christian messageboard (and i certainly
> wasn't the only one), i have been accused of being an
> idiot and a moron by james (even though he claims he
> never insulted anyone and certainly has that entire
> holier-than-thou attitude going on), obviously he
> never once even attemped to refute any argument, nor
> did he ever argue his own point of view. then we had a
> discussion about evil, i explained the very simple
> concept that there is no such thing as absolute evil,
> that evil exists only because we define certain things
> to be evil, and as such that evil is purely
> subjective, there can be no logical denying of the
> fact that this is true, nonetheless james refused to
> accept this and called me an idiot (why? because i'm
> smart enough to realize that what a person believes is
> evil is merely an opinion?), and subsequently banned
> me. i ofcourse then went on to use proxies to annoy
> him, which resulted in him putting the board on
> password access only. obviously i won, a person who
> resorts to namecalling (without backing it up), and
> censorship is clearly giving up on any proper
> intelligent discussion (not that there was any from
> his part to begin with), i for one hope that you all
> will let james know what a total hypocrit he is (first
> claiming to be anti-censorship, but then resorting to
> it the minute someone with a view he can't stand comes
> along), that he is not in any place to call me (a
> person with an iq of around 187) an idiot, and that he
> is showing typical christian behaviour right now by
> his actions, which are actions of cowardice, cop-out
> and frustration.
>
> thank you, and good night as avalanche puts another x
> on his mark for another victory.

I read his question to you about "evil" personally I wouldn't
have called it evil I would have called a person who did all
that a sociopath or psychopath or insane.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: typical, you should all read this.. -- avalanche, 02:29:28 08/31/00 Thu