i had allready refuted the arguments in this post before. -- Council of The Grey

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:20:07 09/03/00 Sun
Author: avalanche
Subject: i had allready refuted the arguments in this post before.
In reply to: Brain 's message, "Re: excuse me, but is there any point to your meaningless insults?" on 02:57:08 09/03/00 Sun

> If it was not a threat WHY did Speechy understand it
> as a threat,

her false interpretation is her problem, not mine.

I did understand it as a threat

you would.

and ANY
> half way intelligent person would!

neither you or speechy are half way intelligent, so you're in no position to make such a claim.

But not you and
> Oyster.

because we're intelligent enough to understand english.

> About YOU being a liar!!! People
> remember your post at CRACKpot�s message board when
> you said that you brought servers down, so as you can
> see there is evidence that I am telling the truth and
> that you are lying!!!!!!!!!!!

if i indeed (which i doubt, as you can not prove that i did) said that i brought servers down, how is that proof that i lied? it isn't, nor is it proof that i threathened anyone.

> Speechy said: http://www.voy.com/3188/4/387.html
> I'm sick off your stupid challenges and games and
> crap. There -you won- You're smarter than me. I'm sick
> of trying to figure out the right response not to get
> fucked w/ by you because you say fucked up things as a
> response to everything. What am I supposed to do, try
> to think of the right smart sounding thing so you
> won't fuck up my computer? How am I supposed to stop
> you? You can do anything you want so why should I even
> bother trying
> ~Speechy
>
> Avalanche said: http://www.voy.com/3188/4/395.html
> no, actually i can, i can mess up the connection if i
> know
> the ip/hostmask, in many ways, including taking over
> the
> isp account, and furthermore, i don't need to send a
> virus by mail, i could send it to an open port on her
> computer and she wouldn't be able to do a damn thing
> about it, furthermore, some friends of mine recently
> developed a virus that travels within the misc.data in
> the mail, not as
> an attachment, just receiving the mailbody activates
> the
> virus, viruses themselves are not that big if coded
> properly, and your computer retrieves data when opening
> mail, this virus is simply encrypted within that data.
> quite simple really. "fucking up" someone's computer
> can be done in so many ways, hey, even a 12 year old
> could do it if he got hold of a trojan. furthermore,
> just
> because she has an imac doesn't mean she's immune for
> this virus, one would simply have to alter some strings
> of it's code so it attacks different filetypes.
>

and again, there is not a single threath in there, anyone with a basic grasp of english can understand this.

> Avalanche also said:
> http://www.voy.com/3188/4/402.html
> it IS possibly to fuck
> up computers like that through a mail virus not in
> attachments, we have allready tested it. and no, we're
> not
> going to release this virus in the wild. that's not why
> we write viruses (i say we, even though i didn't really
> do much in the production of this virus, just some
> suggestions here and there)
>

and again, no threaths in there.

why don't you just give up? you have these logged posts, sure, but nowhere in those posts is there a SINGLE threath, you only interpret there to be because otherwise you don't have a case. but one single objective look at those texts by an intelligent person with a good grasp of english would understand that there is not a single threath in there. please, stop making a fool out of yourself.

"i chose not to choose life, i chose something else"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Avalanche ___C_H_E_C_K___M_A_T_E__ -- Brain, 06:50:57 09/03/00 Sun
- bishop to A6, cease checkmate, checkmate for you. -- avalanche, 07:15:34 09/03/00 Sun
  - Re: I did not know that you play chess? -- Brain, 07:48:24 09/03/00 Sun
    - Re: I did not know that you play chess? -- avalanche, 08:25:59 09/03/00 Sun
      - Re: I did not know that you play chess? -- Brain, 09:32:48 09/03/00 Sun
        Re: I did not know that you play chess? -- avalanche, 11:12:01 09/03/00 Sun