think again. just saying i don't does not make it so. -- Council of The Grey

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:15:01 09/03/00 Sun
Author: avalanche
Subject: think again. just saying i don't does not make it so.
In reply to: Brain 's message, "Re: You Avalanche don�t see many obvious things :(" on 07:55:11 09/03/00 Sun

> > > Yeah right, Albert Einstein�s IQ was about 175 and
> > > yours is 187.
> >
> > first of all, as i allready explained there are
> > different scales. it could be that if einstein had
> > been measured on the same scale as i have, that he'd
> > have an iq of 250. who knows? secondly, the IQ is far
> > from being static, and the most intelligent person
> > that ever lived, might not do a damn thing to change
> > the world, not ever once invent or discover
> something,
> > knowledge is also a key issue. einstein probably knew
> > a lot more than i did (surely relatively speaking, no
> > pun intended).
> >
> >
> > Before you said that your IQ was around
> > > 130
> >
> > that was before i took new tests that indicated an
> > entirely different range, that original factor was
> > derived when i was about 13. as i said, iq is
> dynamic,
> > it shifts continuesly.
> >
> >
> > (I never ever, not for a second believed that your
> > > IQ was 130, it�s somewhere between 80 and 120)
> >
> > believe whatever you want, it's false.
> >
> >
> >
> > and
> > > when you found out that CRACKpot�s IQ is 185 yours
> > had
> > > to be higher than CRACKpot�s
> >
> > excuse me? i think not.
> >
> >
> > since you desperately
> > > want to be the most intelligent person at the
> message
> > > board you had to come up with an higher IQ of 187
> in
> > > order to be more intelligent than CRACKpot.
> >
> > you lie. you claim these things without being able
> > to back them up. look, i really don't give a fuck if
> > you believe me or not, it's the truth, pure fact.
> that
> > simple, wether you accept it or not is of no
> > consequence to me, but please, stop bothering me and
> > others with your disbelief.
> >
> >
> >
> > Who do
> > > you intend to fool? If you were that intelligent
> your
> > > posts would make sense.
> >
> > my posts DO make sense. if you were intelligent,
> you
> > could understand them.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]