Author:
teltalheart/moderator
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 14:08:08 07/24/05 Sun
Author Host/IP: connector.propel.com/209.247.222.41
Post 152A:Son of the Bloodline, The Seventh and First Born.
In the last post, 151A:, I told you of someone who interprets the will of God by what pops into her mind while she's "prayin' 'bout it." Who interprets the will of God?
Who has the 'right' to interpret the will of God, if he even exists?
Surely, everyone interprets things by what their individual brain tells them. Everyone has their own opinion and interpretion. Should we use the Bible as a guide, rewritten though the New Testament was by the Peter and Paul, especially Paul, and their later disciples. It seems everyone can interpret the Bible their own way as well. Certainly David Korish, Jim Jones, and others have done so, to the horror of everyone. So it seems who you believe depends on who you, the individual person, listens to. There is the overall agreement on the subject, if you're Christian, and then there is the minute details. Dancing, good or bad? Women wearing their hair in a certain style on their head, necessary or not, to be a godly person, or to enter Heaven itself? Once saved always saved, or not? I could go on and on.
Where should we start? How about at the starting point!
GOD: There is not one shred of evidence that supports the existance of a one great overall being we call "God." If you could prove God exists you would be the most famous person on this world, forever. No one has done it yet. That should not be suprising. If God exists, no human being could prove Gods existance. If God does not exist, no human being could prove Gods existance. Only God can prove the existance of God.
I saw sign on a church marquee a few days ago about being a "Son of God" by being "saved." It was sort of hinting that one would be the same as a descendant of the 'Bloodline' if one were to become saved. Perhaps it would make one eligible to enter Heaven, according to one's church, but being a descendant of 'The Bloodline' (Bloodline of the Grail) is completely different I assure you. I have live with it all my life and I can attest that some of what has been said about it is very true.
From the book 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail', by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln: "BLOOD ROYAL",
"Although Merovingian culture was both temperate and suprisingly modern, the monarchs who presided over it were another matter. They were not typical even of rulers of their own age, for the atmosphere of mystery and legend, magic and the supernatural surrounded them even during their lifetimes. If the customs and economy of the Merovingian world did not differ markedly from others of the period, the aura about the throne and the royal bloodline was quite unique.
--Sons of the Merovingian blood were not "created" kings. On the contrary, they were automatically regarded as such on the advent of their twelfth birthday. There was no public ceremony of anointment, no coronation of any sort. Power was simply assumed, as by sacred right."..."According to one modern commentator: We may be in the presence of ancient usage of polygamy in a royal family - a family of such rank that its blood could not be ennobled by any match, however advantageous, nor degraded by the blood of slaves...It was a matter of indifference whether a queen were taken from a royal dynasty or from amoung courtesans...The fortuna of the dynasty rested in its blood and was shared by all who were of that blood.7" - Wallace-Hadrill, 'The Long-Haired Kings, p. 203ff.
The mumblings I've been hearing lately from different places, including my work place has been, "you're gone'a get it." It's what I would expect to hear from people who understand nothing of the dichotomy and or metaphoric nature of religion. they seem to understand even very little about their own religion, its borrowing from Mithraism. Many of the ancient gods were said to be born of a god and a virgin, such as Adonis, Osiris and Zoroaster. From Mithraism comes the idea of "an apocalypse, a day of judgment, a resurrection of the flesh and a second coming of Mithras himself, who would finally defeat the principle of evil. Mithras was said to have been born in a cave or a grotto, where shepherds attended him and regaled him with gifts. Baptism played a prominent role in Mithraic rites. So, too, did the communal meal. There is a passage in the Mithraic communion which is particularly interesting: 'He who shall not eat of my body nor drink of my blood so that he may be one with me and I with him, shall not be saved.'" - The Messianic Legacy
I like to believe God exists. Thought I admit can't prove it at all. But, I don't believe he wrote the Bible. Some of the teachings there, I believe do reflect the spirit of God. 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,' etc. Unfortunately the Bible is now used as a hammer for those who want to be in charge to beat other into submission with.
It's, unfortunately, what happens these days with christian who understand little of their own religion that they threaten anyone however they can, who will not walk in lock-step with them. "We'll take away his livelihood, that'll show him," is the attitude.
But, No, that will not show me anything. I am of the Bloodline, and no matter what anyone does nothing will ever change that. We who are of the Bloodline will always be of the Bloodline, and nothing will ever stop or change that. We will always exist. The Bloodline can't be bought away. The Bloodline can't be bartered away. The Bloodline can't be slandered away. The Bloodline can't be hidden away. The Bloodline can't be politicized away. And, the Bloodline can not be prayed away. So everyone can expect us to be around, no matter what.
End post 152A: www.voy.com/40560/
teltalheart, M.D. Barnes.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 
Post 152A: Son of the Bloodline, The Seventh and First Born.