VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: Post 274 A: Religious Dogma


Author:
teltalheart/moderator
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03:14:20 05/24/11 Tue
Author Host/IP: 98-159-200-219.scottsboro.org/98.159.200.219

Post 274 A: Religious Dogma

It is a fact that religion has little to do with documented historical fact. It has much more to do with superstition than fact.

'It has served us well, this myth of Christ.' - Pope Leo X

It was argued by professor Hermann Samuel Reimarus, between 1744 and 1767, of Hamburg, that Jesus was little more than failed Judaic revolutionary.

Nineteenth century German biblical scholarship has dated the Gospels to having been composed at least a generation after the events had happened. This date is still deemed valid today. On April 27th 2011 the great tornado outbreak destroyed several churches here in the south. Would anyone care to say that was the work of God? Or that God, for whatever reason, was angry at churches here in the south? No?

Why then should it be deemed the work of this same God when something happens to someone or some group or organization that is not of the same ilk?

The Scottish Clan MacGregor is descended from Giric, or Grig, (Modern Gaelic: Griogair mac Dhunghail; King of the Picts, born abt. 818. Giric, a.k.a Prince Gregor) was the son of King Alpin (King of Dalriada from 833-841 A.D.) a.k.a Domnall mac Ailpin, King of the Picts, and possibly a.k.a Eochaid.
The son of Giric (a.k.a. King Gregor the Great) would possibly have been Doungallas who married his cousin Spontana, daughter of the High King of Ireland.

Thus the Clan Gregor had a royal claim on both Scotland and Ireland. This would probably have been the underlaying reason for their great misfortunes and turmoil during the 15th and 16th centuries, courtesy of and engineered by the English Crown.

The Crown was first lost due to religious superstition in the year 885 A.D. due to, of all things, a solar eclipse on St Cyrus's day, June 16th.

End Post 274 A: www.voy.com/40560/, teltalheart=Michael D. Barnes

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]



Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.