VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]
Subject: Re: Lot's of theories: Voldemort, Rookwood, Gryffindor's Heir, and Lethifolds


Author:
sarah
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:34:25 03/01/02 Fri
In reply to: KioRustleweed 's message, "Lot's of theories: Voldemort, Rookwood, Gryffindor's Heir, and Lethifolds" on 07:56:33 12/16/01 Sun

Wow that was really great, I must say. You really have some neat ideas. Do you really think that the time turner had anything to do with the whole/Lily/Unspeakable idea? (which was brilliant , just to tell you) I can totally get behind the idea that lily was an unspeakable, but why would the time turner would play a part in it?

I also have another question - What did you mean by Gryffindor's Heir? Are you saying that Harry would be of decent from Godric Gryffindor himself? If you are saying that, i agree. Thats kind of stretching it a bit far, isnt it?

please write back to me,
Sarah Masters








>Hi. I've written a very long post compliling a lot of
>my ideas, theories and reactions to some of the rumors
>floating around the internet. I've been posting these
>on a lot of message boards across the internet to see
>what people think. If you want to contact me, my email
>is kio9528@cs.com. I might not have a chance to reply
>to any posts, but i hope you'll find this intersting,
>in the least. Watch out.
>
>
>Augustus Rookwood and the Department of Mysteries. The
>significance of the character is not always
>recognizable because he is very minor, but I predict
>he is very impotant. In Book 4, while Harry is
>dallying in Dumbledore's thoughts in the Pensieve, he
>sees the trial Karkaroff, who proceeds to name Death
>eaters. However the only undiscovered name he gives is
>Rookwood, who used an intricate net of wizards in the
>Ministry to pass information to Oldy Voldy.
>
>While this fact may seem insignificant at first, you
>shoudl examine the idea of Rowling even mentioning the
>Department of Mysteries in the first place. We know
>absolutley nothing, but I bet we will find out a lot
>more about it in future books. In fact, I'd wager that
>Lily Potter was an Unspeakable before she was murdered
>and that it was some connection to her job that led
>the whole fiasco of the their murders. If this is
>true, it opens worlds of possibilities, not only about
>the function of the Deparment of Mysteries (could it
>be time travel? the Time turner reappears?) but it's
>connection to Harry also, because we know Voldemort
>didn't go to Godric's Hollow to kill Lily. Voldy could
>have gone to kill Harry because of the information he
>obtained from Rookwood. And then, of course, comes the
>question: What is the Order of the Pheonix in the
>first place? Does it have something to do with this
>Department? after all, we're supposed to have a huge
>revelation about Lily.
>
>Another thing that could be connected to the
>Department of Mysteries is Trelawney's first
>prediction. If the Department of Mysteries deal with
>"true" Seers, or at least "true" predictions. Maybe
>then, Lily might be a Seer, although I will admit, its
>very far-fetched.
>
>As for the theory of Harry being Gryffindor's heir: It
>makes sense. In fact the evidence is overwhelming,
>there is so much in favor of this theory that it makes
>me uncomfortable. I want to disbelieve this theory
>because not only is it totaly predictable, I have
>faith in JK to invent something more important, more
>significant than the contiued bloodline of the heirs.
>After all, isn't one of the reoccuring themes in the
>books all about the unimportance of blood, whether
>pure or muggle-born? But then you get Dumbledore's
>gleam of triumph at the use of Harry's blood in
>Voldy's resurection, but that's going completely off
>track.....
>
>The main point I'm trying to make, and I'm depending
>heavily on one piece of information I read in an
>interview, is that JK will not make Harry Heir of
>Gryffindor. What I mean is, JK said that she goes
>online sometimes and reads some of the theories and
>rumors. She said she's surprised at the creativity of
>fans, but she said that no one has guessed what will
>happen yet. And quite a few people have guessed that
>Harry's the heir.
>
>Besides I'd like to think that Harry is as cool as he
>is because of his own ability, not because of some
>inheirited blood.
>
>On a side note, one of the main reasons I argue
>against Gryffindor's heir is the murder of James and
>Lily itself. We all know that Lily needn't have died,
>but what about james? It never says specifically
>whther Voldy was after James too. Nowhere in any of
>the books did it say that Voldemort's intentions were
>to murder James too. It says that he fought Voldemort,
>therefore he had to die. But isn't this just another
>form of getting in the way? Lily was in the way, so
>she died. James was trying to protect his family also,
>and he died. It did NOT say anything about James
>needing to be killed. Of course it doesn't say that
>Voldy didn't not need to kill James.... but I believe
>that James' death was also uneccessary.
>
>I wish Dumbledore would hurry up and tell us why Voldy
>wanted to kill Harry in the first place, he obviously
>knows!
>
>Another thing you might like to know. JK said in
>another interview that cats were something important.
>Or rather, one person asked a question about how many
>cats are in the HP books and whther or not they
>provide some sort of protection. Jk said something to
>the effect that there might be, and that
>question-asker was very observant.
> And the cats are: Crookshanks (part Kneazle,
>obviously), Mrs. Norris, Prof. McGonagall, and Mrs.
>Figg's cats! Can you imagine? At midnight, everynight
>Mrs. Figg makes her cats invisble and has them circle
>the Dursley's house continuosly, meowing in unision...
>well, okay, not really, but I would laugh if it were
>true. I don't think that Mrs. Figg was their secret
>Keeper, because she'd have to do the charm every
>summer, and it just doesn't make very good sense, at
>least, I don't think we can speculate on that until we
>know more about how the Fidelius Charm works.. But the
>cats...ahhh, the cats. Maybe..
>
>Oh, and one last thing. I am quite convinced that
>Harry will meet a Lethifold. If you reread Magical
>Beast and where To Find Them, you will remember that
>the Lethifold is only repelled by the Patronus Charm,
>which we all know Harry is expert at. It also seems
>like the sort of animal Voldy would use to help him
>gain powers. I bet that you could capture a Lethifold,
>even if you couldn't domesticate it. It would be an
>interesting challenge for Harry, anyway.
>
>Sorry so long. any ideas?
>
>Kio Rustleweed
>www.geocities.com/harrypottertrivia

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Lot's of theories: Voldemort, Rookwood, Gryffindor's Heir, and Lethifoldsfiona13:23:55 03/22/02 Fri
    Re: Lot's of theories: Voldemort, Rookwood, Gryffindor's Heir, and LethifoldsArin Ross20:37:46 12/28/02 Sat


    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.